distantsounds CLAPS BACK against Lemmy user, click HERE for their response!
AngryHumanoid
joined 1 year ago
What the fuck is that ugly monstrosity? I love it.
"I'm gonna kill that crazy Broccoli!"
Hear me out, what if we added racing stripes to the straw?
That's just the attitude the lizard people WANT you to have.
It sounds risky, you may find yourself up... Chocolate Creek without a popsicle stick.
That I'm not sure, I've never tried I always just watch it on my laptop or hdmi to a TV, but that site has been my go to for NFL streams for years, back in the say it was a subreddit before it got shutdown and went to their own website, always been reliable for me, worst case you need to switch steams midgame it they have plenty to choose from.
nflbite.com
OK while that would be a better idea the thought that no one would notice is laughable. We have detailed pregnancy rate records going back 75 years, an immediate 30% change would definitely raise a lot of red flags.
One could argue favoring people who wear suits is a way of trying to exclude politicians who come from working class backgrounds. "If you're not comfortable in a suit you don't belong" is how I've heard it described. His constituents seem to like that he's presenting himself as the same person he was when getting elected, shouldn't that be more important?
The key being "if it's true". The only 2 sites I've found making these claims are pretty blatant right wing sites with a vested interest in talking shit about strikes. Beyond that the actual claims in the article are contrasting any spending the WGA has done over the last several years against the current spending needed for the strikes, as if it's some kind of gotcha that the WGA was gasp! spending money but is now ASKING for money! It's not exactly apples to apples even if all their unsourced claims are true.
Now that's a deep cut.