AngryHumanoid

joined 1 year ago
[–] AngryHumanoid@reddthat.com 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Do you have another source for this information? Before I form an opinion I definitely need data from a more reputable site.

[–] AngryHumanoid@reddthat.com 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

True, I was just saying the name.

[–] AngryHumanoid@reddthat.com 10 points 1 year ago

Go home headline, you're drunk.

[–] AngryHumanoid@reddthat.com 110 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Screw you Microsoft, I switched to Paint.net forever ago and I'll be long dead in the cold, cold grave before I recognize Missourah, I mean switch back to Paint.

[–] AngryHumanoid@reddthat.com 35 points 1 year ago (5 children)

This is such a click bait headline. There is no new vaccine, scientists succeeded in a (small) test to link certain molecules with a specific antigen which would make the T cells stop targeting them, but that's a wildly, hilarious massive leap to either claiming a vaccine or a cure for anything.

[–] AngryHumanoid@reddthat.com 183 points 1 year ago (5 children)

It was nothing to do with Windows, it's a sorta joke where the person telling the joke is trying to use logic to compare 2 different things, with humorous results.

A better example is an old Norm Mcdonald (I think) joke, I'll post it below.

A guy sees his new neighbor out in his backyard, so he decides to get acquainted. After introductions, he asks the new neighbor what he does for a living.

The new neighbor says, "I'm a professor." The first neighbor then asks, "Oh yeah, what do you teach?"

"Logic," the professor reponds.

"What is that?" the neighbor inquires.

"Well, let me see if I can give you an example...you have a dog, right?"

"Yeah, that's right," neighbor #1 responds.

"And you have children too, right?" says the professor.

"Wow, right again!" exclaims the neighbor.

"So, then you must be married and that would make you a heterosexual, right?'' proclaims the professor.

"Unbelievable, you're absolutely correct. How do you know all this about me?"

"Well," the professor says, "I observed there was a dog house in your backyard, so you must have a dog. I also saw bicycles next to your garage, so you must have children. And if you have children, you are probably married and if your married, you are most likely heterosexual... it was all logical!"

The next afternoon, the neighbor runs into his old friend. His friend asks if he has met the new neighbor. The man says that he met him yesterday.

"What's he like?"

"Well," the man says, "he's nice and he is a professor of logic."

"Oh," says the friend, "what's logic?"

"Maybe I can give you an example. Do you have a dog house?"

"Why, no, I do not," responds the friend.

"Well, then," proclaims the man, "that means you're gay!"

[–] AngryHumanoid@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

Let's start with the example heavily discussed in this article: smoking drugs while pregnant.

[–] AngryHumanoid@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

You threw up a strawman that was never claimed in the article and now say the burden is on me to disprove it. I forwarded you to the discussion I had with OP and you again made a claim against me without citing anything I actually said. You are not coming off well in this attempt at a conversation. You need to cite specifics.

[–] AngryHumanoid@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

An example of what?

[–] AngryHumanoid@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm contrasting this conversation with the one I had with OP yesterday, where explaining the actions of the hospital from a position of how they and CPS operate shows why they did some of what they did and agreeing with the parts that the courts said we're wrong, and we both came to a better understanding of why each other felt they way they did.

Then there's you, who care more about buzzwords and stirring anger about "human rights" and absolutely no ability to back up your statements. You should have stayed on Reddit, you'd do better there.

view more: ‹ prev next ›