00x0xx

joined 6 months ago
[–] 00x0xx@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

In one battle I read on the Ukraine war, Russia sent out 1000 Iranian drones at once to destroy 5 targets. They knew most will be shot down, but if 4 or 5 drones hit the target, it will destroy the target complete. That's how these drones were designed to be used, dirt cheap to make, but impossible to stop in swarms.

Even 200 still isn't a lot if they aren't coming all at once, and Israel's defense can handle that easily. They're designed to shoot down 100+ numbers or rockets, shells & other air borne targets going much faster than drones before they hit their target.

[–] 00x0xx@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

100 drones isn't enough to do any meaningful damage, so this is a warning shot to Israeli. Or the Iran government is doing this exercise to save face among their own people.

However is Israel doesn't back down from attacking Iranians, Iran might be forced to go all out war with Israel.

[–] 00x0xx@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

This has very little to do with the colonial borders drawn by the British and French almost 100 years ago. Rather it's animosity due to more recent events. In this case, Israel's betray of the Iranian people right before the revolution of 1979.

[–] 00x0xx@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Russia's new strategy is to take it slow. Hence why they just created two new army for defense in Ukraine. They aren't looking to risk trying to finish this quickly.

[–] 00x0xx@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Likely not. Everyone who wanted to leave Russia did so in the 1990’s

[–] 00x0xx@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Pakistan is propped up by the US and China. They will collapse if they lose that support.

[–] 00x0xx@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

About 30-40% of food is wasted in the US, in India its 22%, in China 27%. These are the largest nations in the world. The reality is that we can build more efficient infrastructures that can drastically cut down on this. But we don't need to yet, because it's not cost efficient. That's how much 'free' resources we have produced based on current technologies.

[–] 00x0xx@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Only bad for nations that are shrinking too fast, like some nordic nations and South Korea. But most other nations will benefit from the less population growth rate.

[–] 00x0xx@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago (8 children)

sonally, I like 6B as a good place to plateau. We’re probably already beyond the planet’s carrying capacity so nee

With the current food growing technologies, we can handle 10 billion comfortable well. We will obviously not reach that number anytime soon. But we are on track to shrinking rapidly in many nations. That will destroy these nations.

[–] 00x0xx@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

If you use google maps or iphone maps it will remember the location where you parked, so you can use it as a GPS to find your car.

[–] 00x0xx@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Being accused isn't the same as being found guilty. Especially in the case of real estate, there is always a possibility that what he did to skirt to law and obtain that wealth may not actually be illegal.

That being said I don't know enough on the laws or what he did, but it's probably likely why China hasn't killed him yet. They likely are doing a more drawn out investigation to find out if it's their own poorly written policies that enable men like this to obtain that wealth and what to do to correct it in the eyes of common Chinese citizens.

[–] 00x0xx@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Comac

I remember reading the Chinese had stagnated investment into Comac because it was more cost effective for their airlines to buy Boeing planes instead. But after the two 737-MAX crash, the Chinese was restarting investment and R&D for a Boeing replacement, however because they were far behind due to lack of investments, they wouldn't have anything ready until 2026 the earliest. So I doubt they will be able to compete anytime soon.

view more: next ›