this post was submitted on 21 May 2024
39 points (86.8% liked)

United States | News & Politics

1871 readers
143 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] maculata@aussie.zone 25 points 5 months ago

Ah Joe you’re really fucking this one up.

[–] Carrolade@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Hey, a semantic argument. Yay.

This is why I think the term ethnic cleansing is underused. It's much simpler and has less history.

[–] retrospectology@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah on one hand I understand the argument that the term used to describe what's being done to the populace in Gaza doesn't really materially matter in terms of the moral argument and that "genocide" is exploited to bog down discussion into semantics, but I also see the value in expanding people's understanding of what genocide is and how it can manifest.

Up to this point it's kind of had this aura about it that if it's not literally the Holocaust and the perpetrators aren't explicitly saying "We want to kill every single member of X ethnicity" it's not genocide. But that's not true, and if the general public comes to understand that I think it gives less rhetorical cover for genocidal regimes to hide behind.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Genocide applies to more than literally the Holocaust, but that doesn't mean it applies to every brutal war.

The ICC is responsible for prosecuting genocide. They charged the leader of Sudan with genocide, but not the leader of Israel. This suggests that what happened in the Holocaust and Sudan is not the same as what is happening in Gaza.

[–] Melkath@kbin.social 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Alright, I must be missing something here.

Didn't they just charge Bibi? Is he not the leader of Israel?

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The ICC has three general categories of charges. The most serious is Article 6, "Genocide". This is how the leader of Sudan was charged.

The leaders of Israel and Hamas were all charged only under Articles 7 and 8, which are less serious. Article 7 is "Crimes against humanity". Article 8 is "War crimes".

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

When you’re starving and killing children, then what is it Joe?

[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Ok time for bed Joe

[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Yes it is, joe.

[–] Amoxtli@thelemmy.club 2 points 5 months ago

An immoral man Joe Biden is.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 1 points 4 months ago

The official goal of defeating Hamas is not genocide. The actual goal, as described by multiple Israeli officials and demonstrated by IDF strategies, is genocide. Israel is intentionally and systematically destroying anything that binds the Palestinian people to the land of Palestine, including homes, schools, hospitals, universities, religious institutions, cultural centers, and even cemeteries. They want nothing left for people to return to.