Rd2 and then Rh2 or Rh3 depending on how black moves.
I'm not too familiar with chess notation so hope I got that right
this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2023
14 points (100.0% liked)
Chess
1924 readers
1 users here now
Play chess on-line
FIDE Rankings
| # | Player | Country | Elo |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Magnus Carlsen | ๐ณ๐ด | 2839 |
| 2 | Fabiano Caruana | ๐บ๐ธ | 2786 |
| 3 | Hikaru Nakamura | ๐บ๐ธ | 2780 |
| 4 | Ding Liren ๐ | ๐จ๐ณ | 2780 |
| 5 | Alireza Firouzja | ๐ซ๐ท | 2777 |
| 6 | Ian Nepomniachtchi | ๐ท๐บ | 2771 |
| 7 | Anish Giri | ๐ณ๐ฑ | 2760 |
| 8 | Gukesh D | ๐ฎ๐ณ | 2758 |
| 9 | Viswanathan Anand | ๐ฎ๐ณ | 2754 |
| 10 | Wesley So | ๐บ๐ธ | 2753 |
Tournaments
September 4 - September 22
Check also
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Correct, avoiding the stalemate trap and opening the door for the rook on a3 to swing over and deliver mate with a beautiful sacrifice.
Still not mate in 2:
Rd2 - Qxe4
Rh2 - Qh4
Rxh4#
If the queen leaves the backrank, you can take the bishop with checkmate: Rd2 - Qxe4 - Rxd8# :)
Oh! Indeed
cxd2
If pawn takes the rook on d2, then the other rook goes to h3 for mate
Rxc3, then either Rh3 or Rxd8, depending on Black's next move.
Qa1+ refutes for 2 moves
aw man
I could find only Re3, but I'm unsure. Anyway, It is a mate in 3, not 2
Not sure how either rook would reach e3?
Lol
I was thinking Re7!
I was distracted cause I'm on the road
Re7 is interesting, but Bxe7 Rxa8 Bd/f8 is not mate in 2 like you said
Yes, I know. At least 3 moves
I said that at the original comment
Yeah I just saw, just edited my own
RxA8
This leads to a stalemate
Dayum... Thanks!
Stockfish says itโs a mate in 6 idk where youโre getting mate in 2 from
Rxc3, then either Rh3 or Rxd8, depending on Black's next move.