this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
606 points (97.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

5765 readers
2395 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Berlin artist Simon Weckert used 99 phones and a handcart to create a "virtual traffic jam" on Google Maps

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 118 points 6 months ago (4 children)

There's some security researchers that have done this before as well, and some "grey hats" that reportedly used this technique to get Google to route traffic away from them during their commute by spinning up a whole bunch of phones in their car like this.

[–] PseudorandomNoise@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Do you recall any of the names? I'd love to read those papers and see how effective it was. Depending on the city and the route, people might have no choice but to go over a bridge like that regardless of traffic reports.

[–] RedBauble@sh.itjust.works 36 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

While I don't remember his name, I remember there was a Darknet Diaries episode about the researcher who first investigated the problem. The episode was very thorough, I liked it a lot. I also don't remember the name of the episode, so I guess this comment is kinda useless

[–] KnightontheSun@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I guess this comment is kinda useless

Props for self-awareness and yet still smashing that "reply" button, but I still think your comment is slightly useful. I often just click the "cancel" button once the "useless comment" realization hits me.

Edit: I am wrestling with it now, just after I clicked reply.

[–] scrion@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Your comment was not useless. I learned about a new podcast that I checked out, plus you got to talk about something you liked in a way that made me go look for the episode - haven't found it yet, but found some other, interesting things along the way.

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 6 months ago

Darknet Diaries is SOOOO good.

[–] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago (3 children)

“grey hats”

What's a grey hat?

[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 6 months ago

Chaotic neutral. The best and most fun.

[–] anti_antidote@lemmy.zip 15 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Black hats are typical hackers, white hats are ethical hackers. So grey hats are just morally ambiguous hackers

[–] witx@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Typical hackers

Screw that, go check the original definition of hacker. Those who do bad business with computers are "black hats" not "typical hackers"

[–] perishthethought@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Of course you're right, historically. But since the word hacker came to mean both good and bad in the general publics mind, this is where we are in 2024. We can't fight it.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago

And not just in 2024 grey hats and white hats have existed for quite some time now.

[–] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago
[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago

Purple phantoms in Dark Souls 3

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

I remember an old post about someone seeing a neighbor doing that, I think in Brooklyn or someplace like that.

[–] sneakybells@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

That's clever. Just have a bunch of hidden buckets of phones on battery banks on your preferred route.

[–] GlenRambo@jlai.lu 52 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago

I thought it was way older than that

[–] IHawkMike@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

Ah, nice context. Thanks!

[–] pr06lefs@lemmy.ml 22 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Now try it with maps off, see if google still tracks them.

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Even with gps off, they can get rudimentary location data based on pings to cell towers. It's not pin point obviously, but it roughly tells how many people are in a given area with a phone on them, smart or dumb.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 6 months ago

I don't know if things have improved, but GSM-based positioning has accuracy of +/-2.5km.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

We already know that it does, if you have location tracking/history on (Which it is by default)

[–] menemen@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

But will it still think this is car traffic?

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Most likely does. Wifi location I think is typically on even if GPS isn't.

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 16 points 6 months ago

I guess android virtualization wasn't very developed back then

[–] therealjcdenton@lemmy.zip 14 points 6 months ago
[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

So when is Google going to try to have him arrested?

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] Bonehead@kbin.social 7 points 6 months ago

I doubt it. Replica Radio Flyer wagons are popular, and they look metal but are all plastic.

[–] anarchyrabbit@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Why not round it off to 100 phones? Why stop at 99? Why are you this way?

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 6 months ago

top tier hacking