this post was submitted on 11 May 2024
123 points (94.9% liked)

World News

39096 readers
4173 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
quinten@lemmy.world
NewsAutoMod@lemmy.world
jordanlund@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
lemmyAtom@lemmy.world
FlyingSquid@lemmy.world
123
The Long, Tortured Road to Biden’s Clash With Netanyahu Over Gaza War (www.nytimes.com)
submitted 6 months ago by breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca to c/world@lemmy.world
16 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

President Biden laid it out for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel long before letting the public know. In a conversation bristling with tension on Feb. 11, the president warned the prime minister against a major assault on the Gaza city of Rafah — and suggested that continued U.S. support would depend on how Israel proceeded.

It was an extraordinary moment. For the first time, the president who had so strongly backed Israel’s war against Hamas was essentially threatening to change course. The White House, however, kept the threat secret, making no mention of it in the official statement it released about the call. And indeed, the private warning, perhaps too subtle, fell on deaf ears.

Six days later, on Feb. 17, Mr. Biden heard from Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken. The president’s chief diplomat was calling from his blue-and-white government plane as he was flying home from a security conference in Munich. Despite the president’s warning, Mr. Blinken reported that momentum for an invasion of Rafah was building. It could result in a humanitarian catastrophe, he feared. They had to draw a line.

At that point, the president headed down a road that would lead to the most serious collision between the United States and Israel in a generation.

MBFC
Archive

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 34 points 6 months ago (1 children)

His anger at Mr. Netanyahu boiled over during a private Dec. 23 call that ended when the president hung up on the prime minister. “I’m done,” Mr. Biden said, slamming down the phone.

What’s striking is how they’re trying to use standard diplomatic channels and Netanyahu keeps flipping them off.

Remember that time the GOP invited Bibi to speak to congress on the eve of the long-and-tough fight to get Iran to not go nuclear? And he showed up with a big bomb poster and ranted about how stupid Obama was? Of course, The Demented Rapist trashed it first thing (you’re welcome Bibi - trump’s your guy).

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 24 points 6 months ago (1 children)

In response to American pressure, the Israelis put together an extensive proposal to move a million people out of Rafah to spare them the conflict. But it would require hundreds of thousands of tents and massive quantities of food and water. Whether it was possible to implement was less than certain.

With no agreement, the president was forced to decide whether to allow a pending shipment of bombs that could be used in the attack. This time he said no. His advisers notified the Israelis, but did not tell the public or Congress, which had just passed $15 billion in new military aid for Israel. The idea was to make the point privately to Mr. Netanyahu without a public blowup. But the Israelis leaked the news, at which point Mr. Biden went public on CNN with his vow not to provide any weapons that could be used in a major Rafah operation.

Yeah, just leak it. Screw diplomacy, right Bibi? Gotta pander out there!

[–] Pot8o 12 points 6 months ago

Ummm... the Israeli plan is the forced relocation of Palestinians?

Their big plan to avoid war crimes is to commit a Crime Against Humanity instead.

Wut?

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Listen here Jack, we agreed the genocide was going to be low-key. If you keep this up I might have to give a speech saying I'm disappointed

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 27 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Meanwhile the Trump family is planning to build condos in Gaza.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Which is another reason Bidens been an idiot to put any trust in bibi

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If Biden comes out against Bibi, the Republicans smear him as antisemitic and he loses the Jewish vote and their money). The man is trying to walk the tightrope and it's not easy

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 6 months ago

Yes he should totally care what the antisemitic republican party says. The party that love to blame jews for every issue in the world.

Yes he's terrified of upsetting the Isreali lobbying fund aipac not jews.

Then again he's also a self proclaimed zionist so it's not either of those but him trying to support the country no matter what they do

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Not 100% on board with what Biden is doing? Here's an insinuation that you support Trump! Everyone to my left is all the way to my right!

[–] rigatti@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

They were just making a comparison rather than insinuating that the other poster supports Trump.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

… what?

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 5 points 6 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

In a conversation bristling with tension on Feb. 11, the president warned the prime minister against a major assault on the Gaza city of Rafah — and suggested that continued U.S. support would depend on how Israel proceeded.

“He has just gotten to a point where enough is enough,” said former Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, a onetime Republican senator from Nebraska and a friend of Mr. Biden’s from their days together in Congress and President Barack Obama’s administration.

Interviews with administration officials, members of Congress, Middle East analysts and others, many of whom spoke on condition of anonymity to describe internal deliberations, indicate that the president’s decision came not as a sudden break but as the inexorable result of months of efforts to influence Israel’s behavior.

That suited Mr. Biden, who was eager to move on to reconstruction and possibly seal a broader deal with Saudi Arabia that would grant diplomatic recognition to Israel and transform the region.

On Feb. 8, Mr. Biden’s impatience flared when he told reporters that Israel’s attack on Gaza had been “over the top.” He signed a national security memorandum the same day meant to ensure that U.S. weapons would not be used in violation of international law.

“This combination of domestic imperative and strategic opportunity has driven Biden to a place he never expected to go,” said Martin S. Indyk, a two-time ambassador to Israel and former Middle East special envoy.

The original article contains 2,345 words, the summary contains 237 words. Saved 90%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!