638
submitted 1 week ago by lautan@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world

At an all-hands meeting last week, Google executives responded to employee questions about declining morale even with financial performance improving.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 281 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

“Despite the company’s stellar performance and record earnings, many Googlers have not received meaningful compensation increases” a top-rated employee question read. “When will employee compensation fairly reflect the company’s success and is there a conscious decision to keep wages lower due to a cooling employment market?”

With this leadership, when you unionize. It's literally what they're for.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 78 points 1 week ago

Still, asking the question in this clear way that almost evokes the answer by itself is important. It puts it into the heads of people watching. Could be a union instigator. 😅

[-] Hypx@fedia.io 50 points 1 week ago

It's also why there's no way Google can sustain these numbers. They pay workers like a random startup, just without any possibility of striking it rich on stock options. They are likely to be hemorrhaging talent at all engineering positions.

[-] Lath@kbin.earth 47 points 1 week ago

They don't care. They have monopoly over everything! They have your phones private data, they have your search history, they have your automatically uploaded pictures to Google drive of your butthole! They own you and you'll do as they like, whenever they like! Now where's that guy who knows how to operate all that stuff? Wait, he was fired to lower costs? Oh...

[-] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

For as long as Google is part of FAANG, they will have a nearly unlimited supply of fresh grads to burn through, and fresh grads still line up to work there to get that name on their CV.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago

Yes, the suits have taken over and switched the money squeeze to max.

[-] ours@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

And they'll argue "you don't need [all the things that make this company great]". And then we'll wonder how a once leading company is dying on their now crappy products/services.

[-] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

To be eventually bought up by a private equity firm that gives it the last squeeze before throwing the withered husk on the final Google Graveyard.

[-] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 7 points 1 week ago

And that’s how Microsoft moved into irrelevance under Ballmer until Satya Nadella started focussing on innovation again. When sales lead technology businesses they always decline.

[-] EnderMB@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

You would be mortified at how many people in big tech, including those that have directly experienced injustice or unfair treatment at work, simply want no part of a tech union.

Frankly, some industries absolutely need it (e.g. games). If they'll put up with what they put up with and still choose not to unionize I don't really know how software engineers will...

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Oh I'm aware, am part of the industry. I think the disparately higher compensation relative to the rest of the economy has given us a false idea we're paid fairly (perhaps even unfairly high) for what we produce. Which I have definitely felt myself. In fact I've felt very strange of the disparities within the industry itself. However that's completely the wrong way to look at it. There's no magical upper number that our labor deserves. Everything is determined by what people pay and how much they buy. (I'm not saying that's the only way it should be) So if the revenues and profits are sky high, and we know labor makes most of it happen, then our labor is simply worth that much more. Given that someone will collect the difference, we may as well get a larger share of it. The sooner we recognize that, the sooner we'll get even higher compensation which will be much more beneficial for people in the wider economy than a much smaller proportion of the exec class getting wealthier. But that can't happen without unions. We mistake the temporary labor shortage for stable and strong negotiation leverage.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] lautan@lemmy.ca 183 points 1 week ago

A decline in morale after record profits? I think a pizza party is an order.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 week ago
[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

I'll take a deep pan bbq executive

[-] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

You will take 1/64th of a plain cheese and like it.

load more comments (21 replies)
[-] S_204@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago

My firm threw a staff BBQ at one of the satellite sites yesterday. My director was texting me about going....45 mins away....for a hot dog.... standing in a field on a rainy day.....

Sorry boss, deadlines to meet gotta prioritize my work here.

Yet, there's managers who very likely pay attention to who shows up and who doesn't and judge their work based on it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] yggstyle@lemmy.world 125 points 1 week ago

~~Do no evil.~~

Beatings will continue until morale improves.

[-] Sandbag@lemm.ee 34 points 1 week ago

Beatings will continue until the stock price improves.

[-] cornshark@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

The stock price has improved yet the beatings continue

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NutWrench@lemmy.world 116 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Company-wide email: "We've had our best year EVER and it's all thanks to YOU!"

Me: "Great. Can I have a raise?"

Company: "Oh, we can't afford THAT."

[-] frezik@midwest.social 51 points 1 week ago

"Due to current market conditions . . ." is the line my group has been given. There never seems to be market conditions where the workers get to win.

[-] los_chill@programming.dev 21 points 1 week ago

Market conditions for me but not for thee...

[-] cornshark@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago

"here's a layoff"

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 week ago

Best we can do is a pizza party

[-] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 13 points 1 week ago

We don't even get those any more.

[-] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

Best we can do is mass layoffs and a strictly enforced return-to-office policy

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 82 points 1 week ago

Google is using artificial intelligence to summarize employee comments and questions for the forum.

Well, isn't that a good start?

Anyway, the TLDR "answer" from CFO Porat is "We were spending too much", while Pichai's answer is "We hired too much people". Way to dodge the question, assholes.

Alphabet’s full-time headcount climbed to over 190,000 at the end of 2022, up almost 22% from a year earlier and 40% higher than at the close of 2020.

So they had around 135k employees in 2020. Why the fuck did you overhire, then? Just to lay off and show off to investors as someone who increased profits in the most asinine way?

Pichai then joked that leadership should hold a “Finance 101” Ted Talk for employees.

Yeah, nevermind me, Sundar Pichai, earning way more money year after year while you're all begging for raises, it's just finances, you guys!

[-] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 41 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah, the Finance 101 comment was a good indication he doesn't take the concerns seriously, it's such a flippant response.

I can't imagine why there's a morale problem.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

“There wouldn’t be a morale problem if our employees weren’t so stupid”

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

Ah yes, employees are only mad because they don’t understand the finances. Like, no, we’re disgruntled by layoffs no matter what. Layoffs trade morale and productivity for cash

[-] bitwaba@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Yeah. Let's let him teach a Finance 101 class.

I'd be interested in the lessons a guy that approved a 40% headcount increase then did layoffs and said "I take full responsibility" can teach anyone.

How's the saying go? Those that can, do. Those that can't, teach.. Go on professor. Schools us. The Investors are listening.

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 63 points 1 week ago

This is the same company that fired a bunch of people for opposing genocide, right? That didn't help morale? \s \s \s

[-] KillerWhale@orcas.enjoying.yachts 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The firings ~~fittings~~ will continue until moral improves

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 55 points 1 week ago

Huh who would have seen that coming out of prioritising income over employees (and users)

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago

Exactly, the CEO uses the word "expense" to refer to employees at least 4 times according to my count.

“The problem is a couple of years ago — two years ago, to be precise — we actually got that upside down and expenses started growing faster than revenues,” said Porat

They even joke that they need to give a Finance 101 Ted Talk, as if that will help. From their perspective, employees are not people. They're not even resources to be nurtured. They're expenses. And the company has a duty to keep expenses low.

What a tone-deaf response.

[-] paddirn@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago

I feel like I've been having whiplash at work every other month. One month we'll get word of record profits or cheery news about how we're beating performance targets or whatever, but then the next month we'll hear about some new internal cost-cutting initiative that feels like we're having to tighten our belts with a hint of desperation to it. I never actually know how we're doing because it feels like I'm getting two conflicting impressions.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 23 points 1 week ago

Profits are higher than ever, but line must go up so you're all fired.

[-] Flipper@feddit.de 9 points 1 week ago

This is the best year we've ever had, also there won't be any bonuses anymore.

[-] hamsterkill@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 week ago

Companies can seem very bipolar that way. Always yelling about how well they're doing, while also cutting costs to maximize investor confidence.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 45 points 1 week ago

They’d sell your soul for a couple of bucks.

[-] JPSound@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

That's precisely what they do. But not only their souls but the souls of the employees just trying to provide for their families and live a normal and fulfilled life.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] hamsterkill@lemmy.sdf.org 35 points 1 week ago

I wonder if the decline in morale correlates with the decline in morals.

[-] nifty@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago

Knowledge workers need to get out of this ego-driven complex that they don’t need unions. You’re working class and chattle, believing anything else is delusional and pathetic.

[-] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

For real, we need unions. It's a slow boil now, knowledge workers are the next factory workers.

Soon to be displaced as corporations gobble up another chunk of worker wealth.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
638 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

54319 readers
2779 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS