Ukraine is running short on artillery, which is causing a slowdown in its counteroffensive. Why isn't the West meeting Ukraine's needs? The problem is production capacity: Western factories simply cannot produce the artillery shells as fast as Ukraine can fire them. Investing in production capacity could easily bridge the gap. However, weapons manufacturers are nervous that demand for shells will disappear as soon as the war ends, leaving the infrastructure investments unprofitable. This video explains how guaranteed contracts solve that problem and simultaneously encourage Russia's retreat even before the assembly lines are up and running.

all 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Will_Phelps@mastodon.social 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

@barsoap @ukraine@sopuli.xyz @ukraine@mastodon.world @ukraine@lemmy.ml

Guaranteeing compensation for an order of artillery shells seems like it should be a trivial concept. Leave it to government to complicate simple business and ignore incentive.

Yes, the west has a security interest in negating the combat power of one of their largest geopolitical rivals. Will shells alone win the war? I'm not that optimistic. However, regardless of additional artillery shells' impact on the war, the US has a duty to be prepared for China.

[–] CommunityLinkFixer@lemmings.world 1 points 1 year ago

Hi there! Your text contains links to other Lemmy communities, here are correct links for Lemmy users: !ukraine@lemmy.ml

[–] Spacebar@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ukrain should not be using less shells than Russia. Fixing that discrepancy seems at the minimum to he necessary.

[–] Will_Phelps@mastodon.social 5 points 1 year ago

@Spacebar @barsoap Ukraine especially needs to expend more artillery than Russia during shaping phases of counteroffensives.

If they cannot, the operation is started on a back foot.

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

Even if all it does is get artillery production going faster, it is needed.