this post was submitted on 03 May 2024
21 points (67.2% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

6294 readers
56 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Boeing is for sure a shit show and terribly managed, but I don't think they would blatantly kill guys like that. I think it's far more likely that the first guy did kill himself because he figured everybody would think Boeing whacked him and that would do far more damage to the company than his testimony would. Now any news falls under a suspicious gaze and here we are thinking some other guys unfortunate death is due to nefarious deeds.

Or I'm wrong and Boeing has a CIA division ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Aurix@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The last person surely hasn't been a targeted attack as there is quite some medical trail beforehand and poisoning would have been likely found. As for the first person, there might have been no killer, but perhaps psychological pressure.

[–] 13esq@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

When I heard the second guy died from a combo of influenza b and MRSA, I did immediately think about the logistics of that being a murder.

I'm not saying it's impossible, but it's definitely not the easiest way, or even a guaranteed way to kill someone.

[–] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Didn't the first guy literally say he wasn't going to commit suicide?

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That doesn't really mean anything. You can never see inside someone's mind. It isn't abnormal to hear this or have people say the person was "so happy" that day or in days prior.

[–] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Yeah, but when a whistleblower says they aren't going to commit suicide, that should throw a huge fucking red flag when they die from alleged suicide

[–] NeptuneOrbit@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

Pretty bad when your business interests align with assassinations, whether they did or not...!

[–] A_A@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

This is indeed, I believe, an unpopular opinion 😀
What would you say in the future if there was a third guy and then a fourth guy ? I was suspicious when I heard of the first guy and I am more suspicious now there is a second guy. So, I don't know but if I had to put a number I would say 20% probability they did it. Boeing-boiiingg would have a mafia division.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

They didn't kill anybody. The risk/reward calculation is out of the park.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Really? Let me introduce you to the Firestone Tire Controversy, where executives knew their tires were responsible in the auto accident deaths; they calculated the cost of doing a recall was more expensive than paying out compensation to families and decided to not do a recall, resulting in even more deaths - until they were finally found out.

Companies will abso-fucking-lutely murder and let/or let people die preventable deaths for profits. Sometimes, executives even go to prison for it (3 confirmed deaths in that case).

I don't know about the Boeing cases, but I do know you're naïve if you think executives won't murder people for profits.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's nothing compared to some of the examples you could've given, ranging from various corporations contracting with Pinkertons to attack trade unions, to Coca-Cola assassinating union leaders, to Chiquita and Dole's various atrocities in central America (which is where the term "banana republic" came from) that included fielding private armies and engaging in multiple coups d'etat.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 1 points 6 months ago

A lot of those examples are murdering foreign nationals, which is far less likely to get them in trouble with US law enforcement. But you're absolutely right: trying to make an exhaustive list of proven cases of corporations killing or knowingly allowing preventable deaths in favor of profit would require more of a book than a Lemmy comment.