157
I am scared of the kids that watched the Social Network and wanted to become start-up founders
(sh.itjust.works)
This guy is such a douche.
this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
157 points (97.0% liked)
People Twitter
5168 readers
1919 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a tweet or similar
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
This guy is such a douche.
Altman's got a face that looks like he can't wait to slap ads on ChatGPT.
The Social Network out of all movies/shows? I don't know, Queen's Gambit to chess players would've been a better example
No doubt there are better examples. But him choosing the Social Network just shows the kinda guy he is. Plus the point of Oppenheimer went right over his head
One of my friends had a chess phase catalysed by watching The Queen's Gambit, except she's still enjoying it, so I guess it wasn't a phase
This movies takeaway wasn’t good or bad about physics. It was more that nature is a neutral force and humans will always use it to enact awful displays of “justice”. The movie was as much a warning about nuclear weapons as it was a warning that humans will do anything to further their own goals.
I thought the social network was just a stupid joke. Is it seriously a real movie?
It is, it's about the creation of Facebook hence the title. The movie itself is very well made and I highly recommend it, but using it as an example... yikes.
I mean watching a bunch of dudes making something did inspire me to make something, but I can think of tons of other shows that does the same without the main character screwing over a lot of people to get where he wants.
Yeah around 13 years ago. Here is the trailer for it
It was a pretty good movie. First dvd I ever pirated too lol
for context, Sam Altman is the CEO of OpenAI, and founder cofounder of YCombinator one of the original startup accelerators.
Thank you, I knew I recognised that name, but I couldn't place it
I remember hearing similar sentiments from a couple of decades ago about nuclear physics and engineering in particular. Because they’re not seen as cutting edge fields anymore, they have a hard time competing against other sciences and engineering disciplines. When you factor in computer science as well, things look even more grim.
It’s not new, though. The excellent textbook Feynman on Physics was part of an effort by CalTech to make physics more attractive to the smartest students. Their approach was to get Richard Feynman to teach Physics 101 for a year.
I’m not sure CalTech ever had a legitimate problem with attracting brilliant students to study physics, to be honest, and I suspect that if there was a desperate need for nuclear science the government would be pretty free with scholarships and research grants.
I haven’t watched the movie yet, but I am very familiar with the story. I can’t imagine a biography of Oppenheimer in particular would make someone want to go into physics. Maybe a biography of Feynman would, though. Marie Curie. All I can remember about Neil’s Bohr at the moment is that his department made him go into theoretical physics because he was ridiculously clumsy and kept breaking lab equipment. I’m sure there’s others.
Wasn't "The Social Network" literally about "brodudes" and simplified it down to "They did it to get chicks bro!"