The 100% mathematical PROVABLY_CORRECT proof of existence of the supernatural is at least funny.
It fails to prove dualism, which it then calls the supernatural for no adequately explained reason:
There is nothing new under the sun. Nothing a 3-lb-brain hominid does is impressive. Everyone dies and leaves behind nothing. If no God exists, all is infinitely meaningless. Fortunately, we can prove with mathematical certainty that the supernatural exists:
Would a 5-lb-brain hominid bring new things under the sun ? How about a 15-ton-brain corvid ? How about an acausal robot god wrought from all the ditherings found across the net ? If it is still so why are you so concerned with phrenology ?
- You cannot be deceived that you are conscious.
So far so good, not too contentious, you need consciousness to be deceived, though I will note that it doesn't prove consciousness, only use definitions tautologically.
- Consciousness, in itself, contains only that which you aware of.
No ? Not necessarily, that's overly egocentric. What about the Id ? What about collective consciousness ?
- Consciousness is composed of perceptions and a perceiver.
A bit contentious, and not a very rigorous definition.
- Perceptions are not composed of material things. Red is not a spectrum of light, nor a retinal activation, nor an optical nerve signal, nor a biochemical process in your brain: it is only the experience the perceiver calls “red”.
Qualia != Perceptions, but this is not the worst sin in this "proof".
- The perceiver is not composed of material things. Neither quarks, nor atoms, nor molecules, nor cells, nor organs of the brain, nor the brain > itself experiences red. Associated processes happen, but only the perceiver experience red. To say that a material object “perceives” anything is a category error.
Does a perceiver without a body even exist ? I'm not really a monist myself, but this is clearly a leap.
- Therefore, your consciousness undeniably exists, but it is not material.
Again does it exist untethered from the material ?
- That which exists, yet is not material, is supernatural.
Hum no ? At best preternatural, and even then if you think the natural world follows Dualism, then the spiritual is still natural. I mean yes this arguing about definitions, but by god is this silly.
- The supernatural exists.
QED.