this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
400 points (99.3% liked)

Work Reform

9969 readers
7 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I haven't found the exact date, but it'll be effective ~~130~~ 120 days after publishing in the federal register.

Edit: typo

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] philboydstudge@lemmy.world 128 points 6 months ago (1 children)

My personal highlight:

The Commission also finds that instead of using noncompetes to lock in workers, employers that wish to retain employees can compete on the merits for the worker’s labor services by improving wages and working conditions.

[–] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 months ago

Free market for jobs, how does that feel? Bet they're ecstatic to try the principles of fair competition for themselves.

[–] NeptuneOrbit@lemmy.world 54 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Except on very narrow cases, these have always been a sham. And in those narrow cases it should be an NDA and the onus on the business to actually prove proprietary info was divulged or a patent was violated. Sucks for the businesses, but the alternative was in many cases needlessly handcuffing so many employees

[–] Ioughttamow@kbin.run 30 points 6 months ago (3 children)

My personal opinion is that ndas should require the business to continue paying the employees wage and offering a benefits package as though they were employed. The wage should increase by a ramping percentage each year

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 months ago

Actually important NDAs do this - they'll just pay you to come in (or at least not work anywhere else) until the knowledge you had is irrelevant... and if the action that the NDA would prevent is legitimately damaging there do exist laws around corporate espionage that already cover these breeches. If you outright steal legitimately protected information from an employer (a common example is customer lists) and resell it... an NDA isn't needed. NDAs have traditionally just been used as a scare tactic to contain information that isn't legitimately protected... and, of course, to unfairly punish ex-employees for leaving.

[–] whereisk@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

That's the idea behind CEOs golden parachutes.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

I had an optional non-compete clause in one of my first jobs, but it was rarely activated by the employer, only for senior management and above. It also included payment for the period (iirk third of your salary for 2 years). In my EU country a non-compete without payment wouldn’t have been legal, not sure how it is/was in the US

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

And this folks, is why despite not being perfect. We absolutely should keep the biden administration going. This and the NLRB ruling are some of the most earth shattering empowerment of workers and people in half a century.

No, it doesn't make up for the missteps in Palestine. But the other option is for things to get worse in Palestine in the short term and beyond. But to also not have any consideration by our own government domestically either.

[–] DemBoSain@midwest.social 4 points 6 months ago

It hasn't been published yet. The Federal Register lags behind real life by a few days. Probably on Friday, or possibly early next week.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This is awesome. It looks to be effective immediately?

[–] Atropos@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Effective in 120 days, unless it gets a legal challenge.

[–] philboydstudge@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Sorry, typo on my end! 120 days. My bad, I'm correcting the post.

[–] Atropos@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

No worries! Thanks for the correction

[–] Wiz@midwest.social 2 points 6 months ago

I can't imagine there being a legal challenge! 🙄

[–] half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago