this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2024
223 points (98.3% liked)

United States | News & Politics

1906 readers
1011 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ringwraithfish@startrek.website 134 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Can't afford a home, probably gonna be illegal to be homeless. Guess they should just kill themselves then.

Fuck the modern conservative movement. No empathy for the downtrodden.

[–] johsny@lemmy.world 33 points 6 months ago (3 children)

It is illegal to kill yourself.

[–] Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Born too early to enjoy fully automated luxury gay space communism, born too late to participate in affordable housing, born just in time to go to jail for conspiracy to commit suicide because living is too expensive.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago

Canada has entered the chat.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 15 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The next step is blending them into a nutrient-rich slush that will be fed to people in workhouses

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Too much pork fat to be healthy

[–] TBi@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

That’s a very Soylent remark…

[–] tearsintherain@leminal.space 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

I don't think this is just about conservatives, it's also about the owner class and their quality of life. But def significant overlap.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/apr/16/us-homeless-encampments-companies-profiting-sweeps

Revealed: how companies made $100m clearing California homeless camps Public spending on private sweep contractors is soaring across the state – and unhoused people allege poor treatment

This reminds of the gross, despicable private detention and private prison industry in America.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

They're connected. How many times can you get detained overnight and have your entire life belongings destroyed before you fight the police officer detaining you?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Shanedino@lemmy.world 62 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Would these people rather homeless people break into places and sleeping inside? This seems like the only plausible alternative.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 39 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Of course they would. Homeless people aren’t criminals and they can’t make being homeless a crime, per se, so they just do as much as they can to drive them towards crimes. It’ll be safer to avoid being caught if they break in and can be hidden but if they do get caught it’ll be horrendous. They’ll put them in slave camps-I’m sorry, “jails” and away we go.

It is the most heinous shit imaginable and these broken monsters get off to it.

[–] huginn@feddit.it 9 points 6 months ago

I mean vagrancy is increasingly being criminalized directly.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago

Watch closely as they make providing shelter illegal as well (just like they made providing food illegal). The cruelty is the point.

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 43 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like a great idea.

Of course, if it's a crime to be homeless, it's also a crime to force or coerce someone into commiting that crime.

I look forward to the officials and landlords responsible to be jailed for each crime they helped commit.

[–] altasshet@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 months ago

"No, not like that!"

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 38 points 6 months ago

That's right homeless, you can't sleep here. Just go home already.

[–] BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world 34 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I know this guy who goes to the New York state courthouse everyday to sleep. He doesn't even try to hide. He does it in an occupied court room during a trial, on tax-paid furniture.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

And the dude smells like SHIT.

[–] DarkNightoftheSoul@mander.xyz 19 points 6 months ago (1 children)

it's a shame he doesn't have access to like, a shower or laundry or something.

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

sorry no that would be communism. I'm glad you understand.

[–] DarkNightoftheSoul@mander.xyz 4 points 6 months ago

Dangit, communism ruined this, too!

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 7 points 6 months ago

good, the judge deserves to smell some consequence.

[–] Banzai51@midwest.social 33 points 6 months ago (2 children)

As if we don't know how this Court will decide.

[–] rhandyrhoads@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

I will say I'm somewhat optimistic about this case. Yes the current supreme court has a heavy partisan lean, but I've seen some decisions from the court which my pessimistic side didn't expect to go the way they did.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 31 points 6 months ago

"Let them sleep inside". paraphrasing Marie Antoinette. smh.

[–] nomnomdeplume@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago

Where do we put them if every city, every village, every town lacks compassion and passes a law identical to this

This is why there needs to be a national effort around this, rather than this patchwork approach which often just (expensively&wastefully) moves the problem around without solving it.

[–] penquin@lemm.ee 21 points 6 months ago

So, they won't help them and won't let them be on the streets? Man, homeless folks need to learn to levitate then, so they can sleep in the air instead.

[–] LoamImprovement@beehaw.org 19 points 6 months ago

How's that old quote go again? "The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread."

[–] anachronist@midwest.social 16 points 6 months ago

This is probably the most prescient episode of Star Trek ever: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Past_Tense_(Star_Trek%3A_Deep_Space_Nine)

Basically Sisko and friends go back in time to America in 2024, where it's illegal to be homeless and they get put in an open air prison.

[–] DaSaw@midwest.social 16 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This seems like a no-brainer to me... though it probably isn't. Obviously you have a constitutional right to sleep, wherever you can make space for yourself. If these cities and downs don't want people sleeping outside, they need to provide indoor space for people who haven't actually committed crimes. We treat our criminals better than we treat our homeless.

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

fuck their laws, I think, is the ruling here. just fuck them completely. we do not have a society. your conscience is the only guide.

[–] HeChomk@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Something something, sanctuary districts, something something, Bell Riots. Almost on schedule. WW3 next, then first contact.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Unfortunately, due to a budget restriction, first contact has been canceled. Please accept our apology in the form of nuclear winter.

[–] Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Belk Riots - September 2024

[–] flicker@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Bell.

But yes this seems exactly like the precursor to the Bell Riots...

[–] GrundlButter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Had to look it up, Jesus that's a bit too on the nose.

Alright, I need to finally watch Star Trek through and through.

[–] flicker@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Enjoy, friend.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

They really love pushing buttons dont they

load more comments
view more: next ›