this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
2334 points (99.3% liked)

Privacy

32130 readers
453 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

And since you won't be able to modify web pages, it will also mean the end of customization, either for looks (ie. DarkReader, Stylus), conveniance (ie. Tampermonkey) or accessibility.

The community feedback is... interesting to say the least.

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Definitely time to make our own internet, with hookers and blow.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FellowEarthling@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Can someone please explain to me, a dumdum, why I should be blaming the engineers rather than the people pulling their strings?

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] schmorpel 18 points 1 year ago

I remember watching Chrome fill up long lists of ??? in the task manager, back when I still used Windows and Chrome on an old Laptop. Both CPU and RAM were working at their utmost and that shit blocked everything.

[–] PeterPoopshit@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We should harass the fuck out of this guy until he removes it. This shit is completely uncalled for.

[–] arc@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I find it hard to see how they could protect content from ad blockers without also crippling pages that self modify their own content. Perhaps they could put headers akin to content security policy that forbids external modification. Assuming a browser were to honour that header I could see bad publicity and a lot of people just moving to another browser which doesn't. Additionally, ad blockers aren't the only things that modify pages - breaking accessibility add ons could be more negative publicity (just like with Reddit).

I think browsers would be best off to let websites develop countermeasures if they're so sore about ad blockers. Perhaps they could use "self healing" Javascript libraries that put back content which is removed. Or they could just refuse to work if they detect an ad blocker, e.g. they stick some canaries in the DOM or along blocked paths to see if an ad blocker is present.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] doge_d_aspin@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Greed kills everything good

[–] Zeth0s@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Is these a real google plan, or just an engineer proposal on github?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] diffuselight@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This has to be seen in context of AI - Google will offer this to companies to ‘protect their pages from being scraped’

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] teri@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 year ago

Also fun to read this (by Google employee): https://blog.yoav.ws/posts/web_platform_change_you_do_not_like/ I literally snacked popcorn.

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well time learn how to jailbreak web pages now too

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lohrun@fediverse.boo 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Web 3.0 - users, kindly go fuck yourselves p.s. pay us subscription money and view lots of ads

[–] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago

I feel like lemmy is the real Web 3. I'll die on that little hill gladly

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›