this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2024
259 points (95.1% liked)

Technology

59559 readers
3258 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 95 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

Instead, Musk is allegedly “all in on robotaxi,”

So instead of trying to compete with BYD, they are leaving that space open for Chinese domination, and instead they are trying to catch up to the Waymo-Uber-Lyft race where Tesla has not even tried to compete yet.

To me, it just seems that Musk just doesn't believe in market capitalism and competition. Or that he's exceptionally terrible at it.

[–] TrainsAreCool@lemmy.one 37 points 7 months ago (11 children)

I believe a huge chunk of Tesla's valuation is based on their automation tech, despite having very little real success towards full automation. So they have to focus on that and try to prove they can deliver.

But I'm guessing they won't succeed, as there are fundamental flaws with the technology itself, that can't be solved by throwing more sensors at the problem.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 26 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It seems their stock valuation rests on an assumption that their self-driving tech is unique, useful and best-of-class. I don't see how they can benefit putting these claims to the test by trying to compete in the robotaxi market.

[–] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Their stock valuation rests entirely on large entities shorting the stock, and other large entities saying “I will take that bet!”. That’s pretty much it.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 6 points 7 months ago

All stock valuation rests on like three entities making numbers up, that's not the thing. The question is how long will Wall Street keep Musky boy on the nice list if he is becoming more and more visibly incompetent.

[–] Claidheamh 14 points 7 months ago (4 children)

But can it be solved by throwing less sensors at the problem? Cause that's what he's been doing. Removing sensors from the newer versions that were in the older ones.

[–] PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Drop the cameras, add lidar instead. That's true 3d vision, which no amount of cameras can replace.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 35 points 7 months ago

They'll scream and cry for protectionist policy once they lose the lower end of the market. Musk has one superpower and it's looting the public for his own benefit.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

nah the us is prohibiting chinese imports because they cant compete.

i guess you guys just aint getting cheap evs

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 5 points 7 months ago

Not me, I see a bunch of Polestars already cruising around, and here Teslas are not even the most sold EV. Super cheap itty-bitty locally made EV "trucks" that are as big as a Smart are.

And electric bikes I suppose.

[–] DingoBilly@lemmy.world 56 points 7 months ago (2 children)

So Tesla's entire strategy Elon was working was just abandoned.

Continues down the pathway that Tesla is just going to fade to irrelevance.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 14 points 7 months ago

Already has.

[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Judging by the amount of their vehicles I'm seeing on the roads I'm suspecting they're going to fade into irrelevance like iPhones have.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Its not a like for like comparison. People change car brands all the time, there is very little environment or peripherals to be tied to.

[–] olympicyes@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

in fairness they did get their charging cord to be made the standard for North America. Not sure what power that confers them but it has to be worth something.

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

It happened to Blackberry, everyone had one of those until iPhone came out. IBM used to be the most common PC brand. Everyone used to drive minivans. Markets shift all the time.

[–] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 40 points 7 months ago (1 children)

All their cars are 25000 dollar evs. They just sell them for 4 times that amount.

[–] Toes@ani.social 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] poopkins@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Whoa, the owner acknowledged that the weather was to blame, not Tesla?!

[–] heavy@sh.itjust.works 34 points 7 months ago

Musk is a moron and I hope he keeps getting exposed

[–] TheDude@kbin.social 33 points 7 months ago

They probably aren't stopping planning a model 2, it just ain't gonna cost $25k.

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 31 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Probably couldn't figure out a way to make the '2' serve as a 'Z' in a 1337, sophomoric sex pun, so... that's the end of that project.

[–] jsh@sh.itjust.works 24 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The Tesla Model 2 S3XY Soon to be followed by the Model 4 and Model U.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] APassenger@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

This only serves to make me think you're smarter than Elon Musk.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 27 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Musky can’t make a car that cheap. That’s why.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 25 points 7 months ago (4 children)

When you get in one this is the price you feel like it should cost though

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago

I feel that way in all his cars.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ctkatz@lemmy.ml 13 points 7 months ago

I wouldn't buy one. good job. elon destroying your brand name.

[–] lipilee@feddit.nl 12 points 7 months ago

that's fine, they have the perfect alternative, the cybertruck. /s

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (3 children)

China gonna dominate that price bracket and lower no need to enter a market you cant compete in

load more comments (3 replies)

I just want an inexpensive commuter that gets ~150 miles per charge. I live in a cold climate and I work about 25 miles away, so I need at least 75 miles range on the coldest days. I also want it to be cheaply repairable, so the battery pack needs to be inexpensive to replace.

Tesla isn't offering that, their battery packs are too hard to service and too expensive. So I'm going to keep driving my hybrid until someone makes something to replace it.

Those Chinese sodium-ion batteries look like the perfect solution. Inexpensive, enough range, and less fire risk. My company says they'll be putting in chargers, so I might be willing to go down a bit on range. If Elon wants my business (he probably doesn't), he needs to make a cheap commuter.

[–] AlexisFR@jlai.lu 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Dammit, the idea of a Tesla Hatchback could have been good. But no, they had to make that cyberjoke first...

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 8 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Tesla has abandoned plans to develop an affordable electric Model 2, according to a report in Reuters.

The news organization says it has reviewed company messages that say the affordable Model Y, which Tesla CEO Elon Musk claimed would sell for $25,000 or less, has been axed.

Then, this March, Musk told Tesla workers that the Model 2 would go into production at the company's factory in Berlin.

In light of this news, that statement certainly raises eyebrows—Reuters reports that one of its three unnamed sources told it that the decision to scrap the Model 2 was made in late February.

Instead, Musk is allegedly "all in on robotaxi," Tesla's plan to create an autonomous driving system that could allow its cars to compete with Uber or Lyft without a driver in the equation.

Earlier this week, Tesla posted its worst delivery results since 2020, with an 8.5 percent drop in deliveries year over year and yet another quarter of overproduction that has left the electric carmaker with nearly 150,000 vehicles produced but unsold.


The original article contains 302 words, the summary contains 174 words. Saved 42%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (5 children)

All those that claim this market belongs to China, Tesla already has production in China, and can use all the same benefits Chinese companies can. Including government subsidies.

[–] whereisk@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So long as they keep the Chinese government happy. That's a big lever China has on Musk.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Benaaasaaas@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

Outside companies almost never get the same benefits as local ones, that's true even outside of china. Another thing is that china has national interests in chinese carmakers.

[–] Num10ck@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

Tesla needs to make a certain substantial profit margin, same problem as Apple's car project. BYD will sell at a loss for years to monopolize like Amazon/Walmart etc.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Chinese companies aren't buying detestable social media platforms and speedrunning them into the ground.

[–] guacupado@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

No one's talking about that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hark@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

BYD has a level of vertical integration far beyond anyone else in the industry.

load more comments
view more: next ›