this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
19 points (95.2% liked)

Tree Huggers

609 readers
2 users here now

A community to discuss, appreciate, and advocate for trees and forests. Please follow the SLRPNK instance rules, found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

The general rule of thumb is that it takes about 40 gallons (150 liters) of sap from sugar maples of the Vermont variety to make one gallon (3.8 liters) of syrup, Hegarty said. For red maples, you need at least 60 gallons (more than 225 liters) of sap because more water needs to be removed in the process of making syrup.

Holy crap, I knew syrup farming was inefficient but dam getting less than 4 litres out of 150 litres is insane.

edit followup thought: i suppose it is better to have the forrest than another industrial complex.

[–] xor@infosec.pub 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

well it's concentrated but not inefficient really...
you don't need to use that much...
the average canadian only uses 1 gallon of maple syrup a week...

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

The average Canadian doesn't use a gallon of anything. We go through liters of maple syrup, not gallons.

And it increases if it's a waffle week, since you gotta fill all those little holes.

[–] LibertyLizard 5 points 7 months ago

Yeah sugar bushing is one of the few forms of agriculture that exists in North America that relies on largely intact ecosystems rather than heavily modified or diminished ones. But it is certainly not the most efficient way to produce food, and that’s why maple syrup is so pricey.

[–] JacobCoffinWrites 2 points 7 months ago

Yeah, some big operations use an osmosis rig to remove some of the water before boiling to save fuel, but most of the time you just spend a few days tending the fire and sap (don't want it to burn).