this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2024
16 points (100.0% liked)

Sydney

927 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Not again! BoM issues Flood warning for Qld and NSW.

"A major rain event will engulf most of eastern Australia during the next 48 hours, prompting the Bureau of Meteorology to issue flood watches from southern Queensland to the NSW South Coast.

"Greater Sydney could be soaked by up to 200mm from late Thursday to early Saturday, potentially leading to major flooding along the Hawkesbury-Nepean River, while Brisbane and Canberra also face the prospect of heavy rain."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-04-04/torrential-rain-triggers-flood-watch-for-sydney/103665240

@sydney #sydney #NSW #Australia #ClimateChange #weather #floods

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I think it's easy to forget how much rain there had already been before the last big floods. I don't think anywhere on the east coast has had anywhere near as much rain this year so far. I can't see an event like this having the same impact. We'll see I guess.

[–] ajsadauskas@aus.social 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

@maniacalmanicmania Really hope you're right.

That being said, the pessimist in me thinks we're just at the start of Autumn.

If there's already heavy rains at the start of April, then what's going to happen in May, June, July, August, and September?

It's also the same communities that are likely to be impacted — places like Richmond, Lismore, and the towns along the Hawkesbury.

The cleanup and rebuild is still ongoing from last time. Another round of floods would be the final straw — financially and emotionally — for many people and small businesses in those regions.

And if there's two bad flood seasons in two years, no insurer is going to touch those towns.

Hopefully it doesn't come to that.

But another bad flood season would not just be devastatingly bad. It would be "state government seriously considers relocating entire towns to higher ground" bad.

[–] No1@aussie.zone 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

relocating entire towns to higher ground

I've sometimes wondered about that. Sure the costs would be big, but it might pay off in the long run.

Bahahhahahhaa, who am I kidding? What politician or party cares about the long run. They don't care about anything but the next election.

[–] ajsadauskas@aus.social 4 points 7 months ago

@No1 It's not unprecedented.

A few years ago, after a particularly bad flood, the entire town of Grantham in Queensland was relocated to higher ground: https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/national/queensland/grantham-reborn-meet-the-little-queensland-town-that-moved-20200227-p5450g.html

If you have a town that's in a floodplain, instead of constantly needing to rebuild it every couple of decades (or less) because of floods, it can make sense to do so.

Banks and insurers look at the risk profile, and then adjust the cost of borrowing or insurance premiums accordingly.

At a certain point, it becomes far cheaper to just call in the bulldozers and rebuild elsewhere.

[–] LanguageMan1@social.vivaldi.net 1 points 7 months ago

@ajsadauskas @maniacalmanicmania Weather patterns switch up all around the globe. Sometimes excessive rain and precipitation and other times a lack thereof.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I dunno about down south, but here in Brisbane it's at least felt pretty similar. We've had weeks of on and off miserable rainy weather.

Personally I don't feel too worried, because where I live the biggest concern is the Brisbane River flooding, not creeks or overland flow. And with the Wivenhoe Dam at just 80% (100% only means maximum usable for drinking water, it can store over 200% during flood events), it'll take a lot more before flooding is likely here.

[–] ephemeral_gibbon@aussie.zone 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm not certain of Brisbane, but my family has a little farm about 4 hours north of Sydney. Part of it is floodplains (go under in even small floods) so we tend to be reasonably familiar with the conditions that cause the big floods.

At the moment it's not desperately dry, but the soil can hold a lot more water and there hasn't been enough rain to cause run off so the dams are almost empty.

There's a bit of a downpour now and if it's particularly long and intense there may be a small flood round there, but nothing like the conditions surrounding those devastating floods last year.

Also for a lot of those rivers an occasional small flood is healthy because it helps to clear out the excess water weed that may be building up etc.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 points 7 months ago

The thing with Brisbane is that we get a big variety of different kinds of flooding, with very different characteristics. Overland flow and creek flooding can occur and be very problematic, especially in the more outer suburbs and some higher areas.

But the most destructive kind is when the Brisbane River floods. And that happens for reasons that are impossible for someone purely looking at local conditions in Brisbane to predict. It's a big river with a massive catchment area all the way up to Toowoomba, going south and north to the Gold and Sunshine Coast hinterlands.

And while 2022's floods were preceded by a lot of local rain and local conditions were extremely moist (which meant we got a lot of creek flooding and overland flow in addition to the river flooding), the 2011 flood occurred on a much drier day in Brisbane itself, thanks to the upstream weather being much worse.

Conditions here at least seem to be drying up a lot, and I don't think there's much cause for concern, but back on Thursday, it's the above facts that meant I was still a little worried even despite what it was like here.

[–] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Hmm. 50-150 mm tomorrow for us, up to 50 today and up to 50 Saturday.

We're on a hill so lucky ducks but last time we got 10% of the year's rain in a day quite a lot of trees up and died.

[–] AlexRush@aus.social 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

@naevaTheRat @ajsadauskas Plant some casuarina trees. They don't mind wet feet and are drought tolerant. Added bonus they make spooky whoosing sounds during storms.

[–] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

got powerlines over the property so height limited. Probs not a terrible idea though if we can find dwarf cultivars. The flowering natives tend to be a bit sensitive to wet feet (although the teattrees do great)

[–] ephemeral_gibbon@aussie.zone 1 points 7 months ago

Try out bottlebrush, not sure of the variety but they're one of the trees that does very well on riverbanks and can survive being underwater for 5 days just fine.

They also grow pretty slowly and aren't a massive tree unlike the casuarina.

They love growing on river banks and often go under in floods. A good nursery should be able to point you in the right direction.

[–] ephemeral_gibbon@aussie.zone 1 points 7 months ago

They also grow stupid fast. Most of our river banks are casuarina, bottlebrush and ironbark (the right variety of bottlebrush may be a better bet if you want a smaller tree and flowers)

[–] LanguageMan1@social.vivaldi.net 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

@ajsadauskas @sydney Same thing has applied to parts of California and the US, Canada, Europe, Asia. Then the weather patterns will change again and the excessive precipitation will be in other areas whilst some get dryer. History repeats itself time and time again. When you over 40 or 50 you'll realize it more and more then shrug it off as most of us who are older do.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 4 points 7 months ago

The really odd thing is that we're supposed to be in an El Niño phase, which should mean South America gets a lot of rainfall, but that it's very dry here in the western Pacific. Instead we've ended up with a year just as wet as during the last La Niña event.

[–] LanguageMan1@social.vivaldi.net -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

@ajsadauskas @sydney OOOOHHH! 200 mm? We had between 200-370 mm in one day years ago in Florida. Has happened more than once here and elsewhere in the world. Lots of flooding. Ponds and streams refilled.

[–] No1@aussie.zone 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I guess it all depends where it's falling. 200mm might be nothing in a tropical climate during monsoon season, but catastrophic in a desert climate.

Good luck with your wet willy willys over in Florida.

[–] LanguageMan1@social.vivaldi.net 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

@No1 Very true and depends on over how long of a period of time. 25-80 mm in a matter of 20-30 minutes isn't so great anywhere, much like 400-600+ mm over a two day period.

[–] No1@aussie.zone 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It's very freaky. Rain means growth of the bushland, and then when we get a dry spell that's all fuel for bushfires.

I have friends in Sydney, not in outer suburbs, and there are 2 levels of warnings where they will just abandon their homes. There are fire/wind projections that show they would have 10 minutes to get out. If they were told at the point of ignition.

Our top level of fire danger is now Catastrophic. It basically means gtfo, and if you can't, well lol good luck. The level below that is now only Extreme.

I guess what I'm saying in a roundabout fashion is that rain is a problem, then drought is a problem, then fire is a problem.

Dammit people have things a lot tougher than I have any right to bitch about anything.

I hope everyone stays safe and happy 😊