this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
15 points (94.1% liked)

United Kingdom

4092 readers
83 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] starlinguk@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

How about not having working hours and just getting the job done. Like before Ford invented the 9 to 5.

[–] NuPNuA@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

This, Flexi time for the win. As long as I do seven hours a day, why does it matter what hours they are.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

But how will the boss know you're working if the only evidence is that all the work is getting done?

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For salaried jobs, sure. But the likes of ford would be looking at hourly workers. Where your job involves working with other people. Such environments always needed working hours. But nowadays, few have anything close to 9-5. Even retail tends not to be any more.

But more importantly. Moving away from hour in any lower paid job. Is just creating more opportunity for corporations to rip staff off. It is already way to common for corps to find ways to not pay for the odd bits of time worked.

[–] Patch@feddit.uk 8 points 1 year ago

I thought they meant 6pm-2am for a second there and was going to riot.

Counterpoint to all this anyway: my office has airconditioning, and my house doesn't. If I've got to be somewhere during the heat of midday, I might aswell be there. Commuting back home at 2pm in the worst of the heat sounds like a nightmare.

[–] G4Z@feddit.uk 7 points 1 year ago

Fuck that like, I am not a morning person at all.

[–] Hogger85b@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought hottest part was about 12-3 maybe we need more Spanish hours

[–] wren@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

hard agree on the siesta idea but instead of 12-3 I'd say stop work at 3-6 instead, or work mornings and evenings (with lots of time in between)

in summer, the hottest part of the day can be 4-6pm (because there's a big lag between the sunniest part of the day and the ground heating up, which then heats the air) - also Spain has a weird timezone (GMT+2 despite being west of us, so their sunrise was 5 mins earlier than ours, but was at 7am local time, and ours was at 5:05am)

[–] mobyduck648@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sod that, I hate chirpy enthusiastic morning people at nine let alone at six!

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Sounds like someone needs a daily motivational 6am team meeting.

[–] FatLegTed@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Makes sense if it carries on getting warmer. And it will.

In the Army we used to work those hours in the summer in Germany. That was back in the 80s.

Can't see why we don't do it now.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

How does it work for parents with kids at school? I guess the schools would have to start just as early.

[–] FatLegTed@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

Yes. Like they do abroad.

load more comments
view more: next ›