this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
36 points (92.9% liked)

Games

16742 readers
923 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The card system wasn't even the problem with that game. The horrible story, forced walking around an uninteresting location, endless stupid dialog, and the bugs were what made it bad.

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They completely killed replay value because there was no way I was doing all those quests and conversations a second time.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

As soon as I realized the Skip button during conversations only skipped one line I was done with it.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

Yup. Not the entire conversation, or even sections of it. Just the current line that was on the screen.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

It was such a right choice for the game the developers have to justify why they added it and why the game failed.

[–] nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This game was so weird to me, people wanted more xcom and they got something completely different and it didn't do well. I was mostly turned off the whole marvel thing.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 1 points 7 months ago

Oh, that was the Marvel game from Firaxis?

I was so badly out of the loop, I remember back when basically nothing was known about it and it was talked about in xcom discussion threads, and I was vaguely aware of that Midnight Suns game that bombed, but I didn't know that was the one.

I imagine with how big XCOM got, just making a X-men-themed XCOM clone should have ensured at least as decent hit. I mean, Ubisoft made it big with a Mario-themed one of all things...

[–] pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The cards were great, and I thought I would hate them.

The weird childish conversations and activities really killed the game for me. It was funny sort of. But it was like a 2:1 ratio of bullshit to strategic combat.

[–] Kaldo@kbin.social 3 points 7 months ago

It's actually a pretty good game and the card system works well for it. I got it on a big discount few months ago and was surprised to get so hooked on it even despite the marvel part of it that I have no interest in.