this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
67 points (95.9% liked)

World News

39032 readers
2433 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 8 months ago

Wonder what the actual text was.

Also if they really want a ceasefire why did they continue to veto?

What's next: The Security Council is expected to vote on an alternative resolution put forward by eight member states, calling for an immediate ceasefire for the month of Ramadan to lead to a permanent ceasefire.

That text also demands the release of all hostages without linking it to the ceasefire. The U.S. is expected to veto.

[–] dbilitated@aussie.zone -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

apparently the issue is the US wants to add conditions for Hamas, releasing Israeli hostages and condemning Hamas.

I think that's gross but I think a ceasefire is more important

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, who cares about hostages anyway.

[–] dbilitated@aussie.zone 4 points 8 months ago

it's more, we'll hold up a ceasefire by adding conditions for Israel while thousands of Palestinians are dying of hunger or simply shot. I think the hostages should be returned but that should simply be another negotiation.

Personally I think the hostage release and condemning the initial act are fine but both sides holding up a ceasefire based on those details is terrible. People are dying at a sickening rate.

[–] somethingchameleon@lemmy.ca -3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

"We live in one of the most hotly contested areas in the world by choice and act surprised when the people we're oppressing fight back."

If Israelis didn't want to be taken hostage, they could have left Israel. We got plenty of room for them over here in the good ol' US of A.

But they feel like they're entitled to be there and get mad whenever reality sets in.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They are entitled to be there. They're entitled to breath, eat and be left alone.

[–] somethingchameleon@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Yeah. Just like Aryans were entitled to Germany.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I bet you think this is a witty reply.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Whatever that is supposed to imply. My guess is only some peo0le are agreeable to your grand narrative.