this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
59 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37699 readers
256 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hey Folks!

We've been playing and discussing Calibri, Aptos ( Bierstadt ), Grandview, Seaford, Tenorite and Skeena over on Tildes and I figured you folks would enjoy clicking around and seeing what the differences between them actually are.

I wrote the article, so let me know if there's something you'd like to see as well :D

Cheers !

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] UngodlyAudrey@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't mind Calibri, but Aptos does look like an improvement. I particularly like the serif added to the lowercase L... it has always annoyed me how that and uppercase I look exactly the same in many fonts. It's one of the reasons why I'm partial to fonts with serifs.

[–] jdsalaro@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

but Aptos does look like an improvement

I think so too! Did you click through the Lorem Ipsum examples? Aptos is much easier on the eyes even in dense paragraphs.

I particularly like the serif added to the lowercase L

For the record, my calling those serifs has been a point of contention. To me Aptos feels like a semi-serif, not a sans-serif, although it's officially one! However, it's been suggested to me that I should do away with the serif terminology and call them simply stroke terminals!

Still mulling over this.

[–] Laneus@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh my god yes! future generations will be shocked that it took us that long to solve that particular typography problem.

[–] brainfreeze@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

That was a fantastic article! There's so much that I would never have noticed.

[–] Edlennion@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What are the "display" variants of the new fonts in that article? In the examples, they're the ones with a * appended. They look much narrower to me (which I like).

I'm not at my PC right now, so it may just be that there's an "Aptos Display" font or something 😅

[–] jdsalaro@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What are the “display” variants of the new fonts in that article? They're called that, at least on Office 365: Aptos Display, Grandview Display, etc.

[–] jlow@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

From what I know display font variants are intended for short text, so book titles movie posters, maybe headings but not body text. They usually bolder with more flourishes and look best if they're big on the page but might not be very readable in long, small formats.

[–] Backslash@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Yes they're usually called " Display". IIRC Display variants are optimized to be used on digital displays (usually on the web), where a lower resolution (72ish DPI) than printing (~300 DPI) is quite common.

[–] LucyLastic@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Still adapting to Calibri ... I liked arial because it was usually near the top of the font list so it was easy to find, lol

[–] duncesplayed@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe that's why the new one got renamed to Aptos, ha.

[–] jdsalaro@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why? I'm not getting the joke :D

[–] krogers@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It will be near the top of the list of fonts since it begins with "A". I think that was what they were getting at.

[–] LucyLastic@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thank you for getting the joke :-)

[–] jdsalaro@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Haha big brain time :P

[–] jdsalaro@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I liked arial

OK, you're the only person who has managed to make me angry hehe :)

Someone actually likes Arial ??!!

[–] LucyLastic@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Aside from using it to make jokes? It's not bad, a legible sans-serif that renders well on low resolution screens. A lot of discussions about "clean" fonts seem to squabble over minutiae while the important part of being readable seems forgotten.

[–] jdsalaro@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

I agree wholeheartedly, it's readable, but oh so ugly and brutalistic :P

[–] sloonark@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

And so the Aptos era begins.

[–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm gonna miss the compactness of Calibri. I might have to reduce my font sizes now if I want to use Aptos in my pre-existing spreadsheets.

[–] jdsalaro@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're not wrong about compactness, that's a really good point!

[–] Linnce@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Thebazilly@pathfinder.social 2 points 1 year ago

I agree, I like the variance in line weight on it. I'm a dirty serif-lover, though.

[–] Nuuskis9@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Great article. I lived 40+ years before giving any attention to any fonts at all.

[–] jdsalaro@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Thank you ! I'm a bit overwhelmed by the positive resonance so far, so now I'm wondering what to write after that will give me the same high haha :)

[–] brainfreeze@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

That was a fantastic article! There's so much that I would never have noticed.

[–] astramist@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I fell in love with Tenorite.

[–] jdsalaro@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Why is that :D ?

Not that I disagree with you, as it's also my favorite, but just wanting to hear your reasons :)

[–] shakesbeare@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Wow I always new I hated Calibri but looking at it up close REALLY made me hate it. I don’t know what it is about that font but I just can’t stand it.

[–] GadgeteerZA@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

On that paragraph about prominence, what I do notice is that the letters are way more closed, with less noticeable gaps, for example with a letter 'c'. To those with weaker eyesight, the letters may be seen as an 'o'. But a great article and I liked the comparisons.

[–] jdsalaro@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Now that you say that, I liked Aptos' G, but now I dislike it because it'll likely make things harder for people with poor eyesight.

[–] chinpokomon@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Grandview seemed to do the best in clearly identifying the character 0. Is it an O, 0, I, l, or 1? Even without an example of O clearly visible in the sample text, the shape of 0 was very clear and seems like it should stand apart. Not the only reason to select a font, but it might be important to some.

load more comments
view more: next ›