this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
9 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10188 readers
231 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fades@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lucky CA, murica needs to follow suit desperately

[–] Thrashy@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Does it, though? In the past the argument was that aggregators like Google were stealing site traffic by showing large excepts or summaries of the articles they linked to, and I could understand that, but the new Canadian law seems like it wants to attach a fee to simply showing a hyperlink. That's fundamentally contrary to the way that the Internet was designed to work, and as the examples of blocking in the article demonstrate, it seems to confuse who is providing value to who in this specific instance. I take issue with the big platforms co-opting the open Internet, but penalizing them for showing links off their sites to news organizations seems to be the exact wrong thing to do about it.

[–] Can_Utility@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Political leaders need better tech literacy like yesterday. Legislators not really understanding the fields they’re attempting to regulate is a problem that’s only going to get worse if trends continue.

[–] shanghaibebop@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Exactly this, very much a cut the noise to spite the face situation.

[–] kai@mesita.link 4 points 1 year ago

This might be a blessing in disguise. Let's see how it plays out but I can't help but feel the interaction between mass media and the internet has not been positive and a divorce might be what's needed.

load more comments
view more: next ›