this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2024
40 points (100.0% liked)

Degrowth

741 readers
210 users here now

Discussions about degrowth and all sorts of related topics. This includes UBI, economic democracy, the economics of green technologies, enviromental legislation and many more intressting economic topics.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] timetraveller@lemmy.world 22 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There is more to business than making a profit, profits are taxed differently, businesses that never make a profit may be very good for the employees and the employer, as well as the customers that shop there.

[–] stabby_cicada 9 points 7 months ago

Absolutely. But is that good enough to keep the alternative business plans going? According to this article, I'm not sure it is.

I posted this on degrowth because the rise of secondhand fashion seems to be an example of degrowth in action - a business shifting from production of new items to refurbishing and reselling existing products.

What works - and what doesn't work - in the battle against fast fashion is an important lesson for degrowth proponents everywhere.

[–] ProdigalFrog 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Maybe new clothes could be taxed more, to help used clothing compete? The article mentions Britain proposing laws that would decrease new clothes production by 40%, hopefully that passes.

[–] MrMakabar 5 points 7 months ago

To me this sounds like a bunch of investor funded start ups are competing to take the entire market and are willing to take losses. They also do the work in first world countries, which makes it more expensive. So they can not compete with low cost workers from the Global South. Hence higher costs. However second hand clothes make money for decades and I see no reason this is going to change.