this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2024
43 points (90.6% liked)

Movies

7479 readers
249 users here now

Lemmy

Welcome to Movies, a community for discussing movies, film news, box office, and more! We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about movies and movie related things. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!


Related Communities:

!books@lemmy.world - Discussing books and book-related things.

!comicbooks@lemmy.world - A place to discuss comic books of all types.

!marvelstudios@lemmy.world - LW's home for all things MCU.


While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

  1. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed

  4. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.

    Regarding spoilers; Please put "(Spoilers)" in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don't want to make any hard limits.

    Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don't support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.

Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 61 points 8 months ago (3 children)

It's not superhero fatigue.
It's mid to bad movie fatigue.

[–] ours@lemmy.world 35 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Indeed, I would throw their Star Wars crap in the same pile. I almost missed on Andor considering how meh the rest of Disney Star Wars has gotten.

[–] UKFilmNerd@feddit.uk 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Agreed. As an old school Star Wars fan, Disney, in my opinion, has soured the franchise for me.

Mandalorian started well, but I was bored by the middle of season 2. Boba Fett had a few good moments, but it was such a fan service show, it was irritating to watch and incorporating half a season of Mando into it didn't help. Obi Wan was a completely pointless story that added nothing to the saga. Again, more fan service of wanting to see Vader and Obi-Wan face off again. Andor was the only show that felt like real Star Wars.

I can't believe the next film is for The Mandalorian, haven't we had enough of him already. I was really looking forward to Rogue Squadron, shame it was cancelled.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I'm still in awe at their decision to make the action scenes be a bunch of a dudes shooting at a guy in armor that can't even be beat by lightsabers and thus having zero stakes.

Which makes no sense, btw, even in Disney canon the Jedi were what tilted the tide in the various Mandalorian Wars.

It does make Windu casually beheading Jango even more baller though, so, eh...

[–] pr06lefs@lemmy.ml 7 points 8 months ago

looking forward to plush toy tie ins for the second season of andor. how about a kid ewoks on naboo subplot!!

[–] Wahots@pawb.social 5 points 8 months ago

It's the Scooby-Doo problem: everything is completely formulaic. Hero has humble beginnings. Finds a wise old man character or helper. Somehow, a little-known enemy has a massive planet sized base. The hero blows it all up in 2 hours.

Also, all the enemies are purely bad, and the good guys are purely good. In these universes, there's no fall damage and no insurance companies either.

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Which is really bad script fatigue.

[–] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

As they say, you can't make a good movie from a bad screenplay.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Until this article I was seriously wondering if Kevin Fague had left the company. If he's the guy with The Vision then who's oking all this stuff?

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

It's Feige, and he's still the boss but he is much higher up the chain of command at Disney now and probably doesn't have the time to manage it that closely anymore.

[–] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I would agree. The last few marvel movies have been awful. I’m not tired of super hero movies. I’m tired of bad super hero movies.

[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Not sure why you were down voted because I agree: I'm not tired of superhero movies, just bad or mid movies. The fact that Guardians 3 and Spiderverse made lots of money and were really good movies was not a coincidence. It just means Marvel has to try a bit more than they used to.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 28 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

"I guess people just don't like super hero movies any more."

Guardians of the Galaxy 3 in May last year: $845.6 million at the box office.

As others are saying, it's because Disney got greedy and started shitting out mediocre movies. And DC has never really gotten its act together.

[–] yessikg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's really low for a Disney movie with such a big budget, they expected at least a billion

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Guardians of the Galaxy: $773.3 million

Guardians of the Galaxy 2: $869.8 million

Guess those were flops, too.

[–] MaroonMage@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago (2 children)

...though sources say that even before Majors’ conviction, the studio was making moves to minimize the character after Quantumania underperformed, grossing $476 million

Jonathan Majors-related stuff aside, this sentence makes me shake my head.

Why does it seem like Hollywood always takes the wrong lesson from box office results? Quantumania isn't well received, and instead of assuming it's because of the bad script or bad story or rushed CGI, their impulse is to retool their entire franchise to minimize a character? Especially a character who people were generally into (at that time, at least...again, Majors stuff aside).

People disliked Quantamania not because of Kang, people disliked it because it wasn't a good movie. Maybe if you tie good stories and good filmmaking to your multi-billion dollar franchise and stop plopping out half thought out turds, then people will go see your movie.

[–] MamboGator@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

The thing I hated most about Quantumania was that nothing was real. Every background was a CGI mess made of a bunch of ethereal looking blobs of land and sky. It's like whoever designed the quantum realm saw a couple photos of space nebulae and desert hoodoos and thought that would somehow work if they slapped a bunch of actors on top.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 5 points 8 months ago

My favorite bit from Quantumania was trying to normalize the idea of a technocracy to children.

[–] beefcat@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It’s no secret that since the 2019 Avengers: Endgame, the company was asked to scale up in an unprecedented way to feed its fledgling streaming service, Disney+

There’s the problem

“Some of our studios lost a little focus. So the first step that we’ve taken is that we’ve reduced volume,” Iger said on a Feb. 7 earnings call.

And there’s a big part of the solution. Another is giving actual creatives more control over the final product, which they also alluded to.

My hope is that with scaled back Marvel production, they can direct some of that money towards new, original IP.

[–] MamboGator@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Bob Chapek really was the worst person to be put in charge of Disney. He did a huge amount of damage in such a short amount of time. I have no love for any CEO, but Iger at least seems to have a better idea of how to run things.

I recall reading somewhere that the (terrible) live action remakes were Chapek's pet project even before he was CEO, but I can't find the source anymore so take my words with a grain of salt.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I'm too fatigued by this crap to even make it to the bottom of the article