this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
96 points (88.1% liked)

Fediverse

28351 readers
560 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Afaik, whenever an Activitypub instance has defederated from another it has always had to do with some combination of bad user behavior, poor moderation, and/or spam. Are the various instance admins who have decided to preemptively block threads.net simply convinced that these traits will be inevitable with it? Is it more of a symbolic move, because we all hate Meta? Or is the idea to just maintain a barrier (albeit a porous one) between us and the part of the Internet inhabited by our chuddy relatives?

(For my part, I'm working on setting up my own Lemmy and/or Pixelfed instance(s) and I do not currently intend to defederate.)

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think it might accomplish more to wait a few days or hours for them to do something that egregiously violates community standards, then defederate en masse—and use the defederation as an event to draw media attention to their practices.

[–] Grangle1@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Threads is already 30x bigger than Lemmy and many times bigger than even Mastodon. Mass defederation won't be making any sort of large media news outlets. We wouldn't have any sort of significant numbers at that point.

[–] Kurt@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It would be nice if there was some kind of open Internet code of conduct that could be pointed to as a reason for defederating, which journalists could reference in their coverage.

[–] sauerkraus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The code reads: moderate your own instance however you like.

[–] sab@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

For the user experience, blocking meta just means that we won't have random people who are into baking and casual consumers of social media randomly stumble upon and

[–] kglitch@kglitch.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"ownership over my audience".

:vomit:

[–] Jimbo@yiffit.net 1 points 1 year ago

Yes among many many other things I don't want Facebook mouthbreathers ruining the nice open communities we have around here...

Guaranteed there will be an avalanche of spam and hate

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

A sense of superiority and seeking approval from the annoyingly vocal fedi community.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›