this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
381 points (92.2% liked)

Technology

59197 readers
2873 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] trouser_mouse@lemmy.world 94 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm mainly avoiding it because it's dumb

[–] BobVersionFour@kbin.social 49 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That. I never understood the usefullness of twitter anyway so i won't find Threads usefull either

[–] Zero@ezekielrage.com 38 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's because you don't idolize celebrities and other famous figures enough to know what they do daily.

[–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago

There were a lot more people on Twitter than pop culture celebrities.

In pretty much any field you can think of, some of its leading figures would be on there. Economics, urbanism, tech, astronomy, game developers, journalists, fan communities of essentially any creative work, communities for marginalized identities, pretty much any interest was well-represented there.

[–] danielbln@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Garbage in, garbage out. I use(d) Twitter to follow a bunch of high profile Machine Learning and Software Engineering professionals, and my (non algorithmic) feed was rather useful and informative.

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I feel tabloid stuff gets pushed to me from everywhere, why should I go looking for more of that.

[–] Swictor@mander.xyz 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was great for artists and scientists. My twitter feed was mainly filled with paleoartists and paleontologists bickering about the fullness of t rex lips and I sorely miss it.

[–] danielbln@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I'm using Mastodon these days, and while not everyone from Twitter is there, bird.makeup fills the gap enough that it gives me a pretty similar experience.

[–] Melonpoly@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Did we really need a YouTube video to explain why one shouldn't use meta products?

[–] Raildrake@vlemmy.net 45 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I really don't get this trend of turning everything into a video. Is it supposed to be easier to consume?

I would much rather read an article and get the information I want at the pace I want.

[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

My workplace has taught me that the majority of adults cannot read above a fifth grade level.

[–] whenever8186@feddit.uk 11 points 1 year ago

Yep. If it's a video it gets a hard pass from me. They can get their 'views' from someone else.

[–] trifictional@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Just be thankful it’s an 8 minute video and not a 2 minute tic tok full of weird facial expressions.

[–] Caboose12000@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

videos are easier to consume while doing something else. reading may be faster, but you can't drive to work, do the dishes, workout, etc. while reading. if you're not into multitasking then reading is the clearly better option, but I think most young people have grown up so surrounded by barrages of inormation from different sources all at once that multitasking comes extremely naturally to them

[–] Raildrake@vlemmy.net 7 points 1 year ago

I have to say I also watch videos in background while doing other stuff, but that doesn't make it a better medium to convey information, just more practical when the information is not important enough to be the main focus of someone's attention, and that's pretty subjective.

But I do get the point, I just wish it was different.

[–] mystic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

glad to know that I'm not alone who prefers to read articles over watching videos

[–] Paradox@lemdro.id 3 points 1 year ago

Videos get more money per impression

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 48 points 1 year ago

I'm avoiding it because I have Meta's entire network blocked at my router. 😄

[–] mysoulishome@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

Because Reddit in my opinion was the least worst social network until a month ago, now that I’m gone I’m not going to go signing up for another Zuckerberg/musk/spez monstrosity. I go on TikTok because I have a teenage daughter and we need something to talk about. Other than that…no. Federation/non-profit or nothing.

[–] jacktherippah@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I mean, the fact that it's made by Meta should be a good enough reason. I'm avoiding Meta like the plague. Fucking sucks that I need Facebook Messenger for school group chats though.

[–] HidingCat@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Yea, that's the problem, I want to de-meta as much as I can, but real-life their network effect is so large you can't not use them on some level. While I've not been using Facebook for years, I still have to use WhatsApp. xD

[–] Puppy@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago

I tried to use Threads but I couldn't change my visible username without going to Instagram, which I never used in my life ..... and then I went to instagram to update my Threads profile but I couldn't because I needed a Facebook account, which I don't have. I found this incredibly frustrating and dumb so I uninstalled everything.

[–] MostlyBirds@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Twitter was always trash. Why would I want to use a halfassed knockoff version from an exponentially worse company?

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Elron somehow made Twitter so bad that fake Zuckbook Twitter looks good by comparison.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] ekZepp@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

@MrLovenstein@mastodon.social

[–] rdca@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m avoiding because is Meta, deleted FB and Instagram in 2015 and WhatsApp when they merged the accounts! Already blocked Threads domain on my Pi-hole!

[–] lemba@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

Same here! I dodged FB when they listed on the stock exchange.

[–] Nahaelem@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly! I don’t think a lot of people care about privacy.

[–] ward2k@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Honestly if you're using Lemmy all this information is already publicly accessible, any public forum isnt privacy friendly

[–] Voytrekk@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Sure, the information we post here is public, but you can remain anonymous if you want.

[–] Nahaelem@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I’m not talking about the public stuff, because that’s not where the money is for Meta. Here is the stuff the Thread app collects

Now juxtapose that with what the Lemmy app collects.

[–] ward2k@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sorry misunderstood your comment, yeah Threads/Meta is god awful for collecting data wouldn't want to touch them personally

There definitely is money in it for Meta though, just yesterday there was quite a popular post showing the types of data that is available to both users and instance owners. If one wanted to they could use things such as your upvotes and down votes to build a sort of profile about you, your political affiliations, interests etc

Meta isn't just a problem, ad companies can easily set up an instance to start collecting data from other servers

[–] fearout@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Oh, it’s worse than that even. Tap on that block and see the whole list. There are like ~170 separate data points listed, it’s insane. They’re saving everything!

[–] sharkato@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

What's surprising to me is that the android version of threads has no such requirements. It asks for contacts, camera, location, photos, notification, and mic permissions, and you don't need to enable them to use the app

[–] techgearwhips@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Ok so Mastadon it is then

[–] Ignacio@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

I'm avoiding it because:

  1. I live in the European Union. Yay!

  2. Either I have gazillions of followers, or I'm a mere leprous peasant not worthy to interact with.

[–] onparole@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Meh, seriously contemplating deleting my Facebook, mostly for oooold friends. I enjoy Instagram. Fuck Threads. WhatsApp is the shit. And I'm in the EU.

[–] Kururin@talk.kururin.tech 2 points 1 year ago

Imagine using a product by Facebook. The same company which sold millions of its user data to ad company without their user knowledge. 🤡

load more comments
view more: next ›