RetroGaming

19126 readers

209 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

Be kind.
No spam or soliciting for money.
No racism or other bigotry allowed.
Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Xylinna@lemmy.world

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

gts@lemmy.world

-13

at what point do you draw the line for "retro"? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 year ago by InkstainTheBat@lemmy.ml to c/retrogaming@lemmy.world

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

And what category does the PS2, Wii, Xbox, Nintendo DS/3DS fit into? They aren't retroz but they're not really "modern" either

top 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] MonitorZero@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Honestly retro is anything I have the ability to backup and preserve. Now that digital stores are the default if I can back it up. It's retro. Not much you can download and just have or not need an offline component.

[–] marigo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It still feels weird to class the 360 era as retro, even though the launch is approaching 20 years ago. I'd say anything PS2/GC and earlier.

[–] nezbyte@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

My opinion is that retro is at least 2 generations ago.

[–] wavebeam@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I’ve kinda decided that at this point anything that can natively output an analogue video signal is retro. Which would include Wii U I guess. But yeah, PS3 and 360 are kinda retro at this point even though it feels a bit weird.