this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2024
24 points (100.0% liked)

transgender

1936 readers
36 users here now

Welcome to lemmy.ml/c/transgender! This is a community for sharing transgender or gender diverse related news articles, posts, and support for the community.

Rules:

  1. Bigotry, transphobia, racism, nationalism, and chauvinism are not allowed.

  2. Selfies are not permitted for the safety of users.

  3. No surveys or studies.

  4. Debating transgender rights is not allowed. Transgender rights are human rights. Debating transgender healthcare is not allowed. Transgender healthcare is a necessity.

  5. No civility policing transgender people. Transgender people have a right to be angry about transphobia and be rude to transphobes.

  6. If you are cis, do not downvote posts. We don't like you manipulating our community.

  7. Posts about dysphoria/trauma/transphobia should be NSFW tagged for community health purposes.

  8. For both cis and trans people: Please alter your username (if possible) to include pronouns (or lack thereof, or questioning) so no one misgenders anyone. details. This rule is important for maintaining a safe place. If you can't change your ID, please let a mod know and include it in your bio.

  9. Leftist infighting is not allowed.

Please remember to report posts that break any of these rules, it makes our job easier!


If you are looking for a more secure and safe trans space, we suggest you visit https://hexbear.net/c/traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns. While we will try our best, lemmy.ml/c/transgender is far more open to the fediverse, and also to trolls. One of the site admins of lemmy.ml, nutomic, is also a transphobe, while hexbear is ran mostly by trans people and has a very active trans community.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

While I agree NY is more accessible than is often assumed, it’s a lot to ask someone to quickly adapt to simply because it’s within their birth-nation borders.

It would be like turning away central Canadian climate refugees because they hadn’t “sufficiently demonstrated” why Vancouver, specifically, couldn’t provide refuge.

My point is it translates to the same thing the world over: “you’re not welcome here.”

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Canada's Federal Court has overturned a decision granting refugee status to an American transgender woman who successfully argued that a combination of gun culture and rising transphobia left her at risk of persecution in the United States.

In a decision released this week, Judge Christine Pallotta said the Refugee Appeal Division erred in finding Colorado authorities were incapable of protecting Daria Bloodworth from a roommate she accused of stalking her — and that her safety couldn't be guaranteed elsewhere in the U.S.

"It was made pretty clear from the get go that this was going to be an uphill battle — winning this thing, or even staying in Canada a little bit longer and not get murdered in the U.S.," Bloodworth told the CBC.

Bloodworth came to Canada in 2019, seeking refugee protection in relation to claims that she was the target of threats and violence from a former roommate, her former landlord and a debt collection agency.

"The RPD failed to consider how Colorado's open carry gun laws combined with the general climate of anti-trans hatred growing in the US could make [her] perpetually vulnerable and at risk to her life," Mohan wrote.

The federal court ruling also says the appeal division failed to determine that internal flight was impossible — saying that "more than evidence demonstrating hardship and disadvantage" was needed to take New York City off the list.


The original article contains 834 words, the summary contains 223 words. Saved 73%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] xilliah@beehaw.org 2 points 9 months ago

I don't even know anymore which timeline this is.

[–] cobra89@beehaw.org 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

While I sympathize with this woman's situation, if they granted every person with a stalker asylum the entire system would be so overwhelmed it wouldn't function.

The article says she claimed the Colorado police wouldn't help her, but that's pretty typical, no? It doesn't detail any of the threats against her but police don't do anything until a restraining order is obtained. Instead of trying to do that or changing her name she runs to Canada and represents herself for her asylum case? Just a lot of weird things about this story IMO.

[–] DariaBloodworth@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I literally did try to get a restraining order. The RPD affirmed that fact. The RAD affirmed that fact. The Federal Court affirmed that fact. That's not in dispute. I literally submitted both the refusal of the protection order and the copy of the filings to the RPD, along with police records and lots of other things.

You're talking about an article about a judgment concerning a case with a tribunal's record over 22,000 pages long.