I wouldn't say it's insane for a republican to be racist. Obviously racist? Sure. But not insane.
this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
174 points (98.3% liked)
politics
19096 readers
3709 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Something being expected does not make it sane.
I think sanity or Insanity is linked to being mentally abnormal, not normal, while this disappointing behavior and state of mind is pretty normal.
I don't consider racism abnormal since it's so common, or a mental illness; racism is a frightened, prejudiced reaction to differences.
Offensive and unwelcome, but very common in a normal state of mind.
I guess you could say the rant was insane, because he doesn't seem to understand the consequences of being so openly racist.
But it isn't like you have to be in a mental institution to hear a racist rant.
Yes, what he said was way out of line and he should apologize like she said. But paying your husband with campaign funds to be your personal security is a little weird, right?
Which is why her funding is already being investigated. His comments are completely unnecessary.
Exactly. She's rightly being investigated and she deserves to be criticized for what at best, seems like a conflict of interest for employing her husband, but she should not be subjected to racist attacks. Troy Nehls is just a bigoted piece of garbage looking for an excuse to go on a racist rant to score some easy points with his racist constituents.
The moment Republicans turned a blind eye to the Trump administration they lost any ability to cry nepotism. You and I can talk about it, but I will not suffer Republicans talking about it.
Less weird then hiring your 2 sons and your daughter to high ranking gov positions. At least he has an interest in the actual job and isn't there to fleece the taxpayers.
Hey! Ivanka didn’t even get a paycheck though! She loved the US so much that she worked for free! It was a sacrifice!
Never mind the millions she and Jared raked in from foreign governments - she didn’t have a salary!
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/ivanka-trump-taking-formal-role-administration/story?id=46454858
https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-did-ivanka-trump-jared-kushner-make-640m-white-house-1724996
So is hiring your kids and giving them security clearance.
I was wondering about that.
Did they actually ever get security clearance?
The issue seemed to be that they couldn't (due to clear links to questionable money sources and contacts) and still got all the sensitive info.
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A White House whistleblower has said the Trump administration overruled security experts to give questionable security clearances to more than two dozen people, including the president's daughter Ivanka and son-in-law Jared Kushner.
Tricia Newbold, a White House security adviser, told Democrats in Congress that clearances were initially denied to dozens of administration officials because of concerns over possible foreign influence, conflicts of interests, questionable or criminal conduct, financial problems or drug abuse.
She said President Donald Trump's former White House personnel security director, Carl Kline, personally overruled the career officials' judgements in the cases of two senior officials.
So there's really no point to the review process considering it can be overridden and it doesn't even take the President himself to do it.
Bizarre, huh? Just about every day during that nightmare of an administration I'd find myself wondering what the fuck was going on.
They didn't need it to profit from their positions.
It’s hard to imagine he’s providing competent service as a protective agent, though it may be more that he’s simply managing her detail, etc.
It’s usually a bad idea to have friends/intimate relations as body guards. For one thing, any attempted assassination or whatever is going to account for your security detail, which means whoever is going to have a target on their back. It exposes him to increased risks.
For another, if he’s busy being a husband (and presumably a father,), he’s not busy being a body guard.
But he’s probably just managing the staff, meeting them, reviewing their backgrounds etc, making sure their personalities “fit”,
Regardless it’s pretty normal to give families consultant fees all the freaking time.
If it's a Republican you can just say rant, the insanely racist bit is understood
RCGOIRRACB