this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
129 points (93.3% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54698 readers
871 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Wanted to know if there are any other android apps with features like telegram such as sending ,recieving big files creating channels etc. Using a bot or channel in telegram to pirate movies and series are infinitely easier than torrenting . But as telegram is not fully open source and requires a phone number to create an account i am looking to see if there are any better alternatives which aldready does have a piracy ring like telegram . If you know any share . I am asking this here because i think it is the right sub and i can't find an alternative anywhere on the web . If it isn't the sub for this i will delete the post if you request so in the comments.

EDIT : It seems everyone missed my questions point i don't want a privacy focused app like telegram to chat i want a app that is privacy focused but can also help me pirate media .

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hiajen@feddit.de 39 points 10 months ago

Matrix i guess, its a federated messaging protocoll. Flagship messenger app would be Element. Sending large files would depend on the server you are on.

[–] gasull@lemmy.ml 21 points 10 months ago (2 children)

SimpleX has the best privacy, because of removing metadata.

Signal comes close, and has many more users. Probably some of your friends already use it.

If you want something similar to Telegram/Discord/Slack, then Element (Matrix) is what you're looking for.

All of the above are E2EE.

[–] THEDAEMON@lemmy.ml 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No all my friend are on insta 🤢

[–] undeffeined@lemmy.ml 15 points 10 months ago

Time for new friends!

/s

It sucks, I know :(

[–] Lemmchen@feddit.de 1 points 10 months ago

Sending big files over Signal or SimpleX? I doubt it.

[–] JoeBidet@lemmy.ml 19 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Simplex.chat is promising, with great privacy/anonymity concepts at its core:

  • no identifyer like a phone# or an email address needed
  • little to no metadata transiting by the server
  • identity management ("incognito" identities generated in one click when joining a group for instance, management of several identities), all database/client-side.
  • works with any server, through tor by default. different servers used to send/receive messages.
  • android/ios/linux-tui/linux-desktop/macos/windows versions available
  • in Haskell, so no node/electron shtf#ckery (just a different shtf#ckery... ;)) )
[–] THEDAEMON@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago

Thanks may have to piggyback on it later

[–] Gooey0210@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

If you're on simplex you will understand this joke:

Simplex sucks because we need stickers

P.s. really love simplex, would like to see more stability and maybe speed, but everything else works just great

[–] sqgl@beehaw.org 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Has bugs re invites. Not for noobs.

[–] JustUseMint@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Signal is the best, honestly the tech is unbeatable. If you don't want to use a phone number, then Session is similar albeit with less robust encryption protocols.

[–] beSyl 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They need to finally release the usernames feature. That will probably make it much more usable. At some point I managed to convince some of my friends to use signal, but ever since they removed sms support, even I don't use it.

They should have waited for usernames to remove the sms support.

[–] JustUseMint@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

I don't understand why the sms thing is such a big deal. Either use it or don't, as in, I use shitty sms android when I must buy the majority of my communications are done through signal. Sms is not secure and should be avoided.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

+1

Signal has been legit and trustworthy for many years

[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (2 children)

While I agree with your and a more open/private telegram would be great the thing is that the current alternatives, Signal, Matrix, whatever are simply subpar alternatives when it comes to the clients. We can say a lot about telegram's privacy but the true is that all their native mobile and desktop clients outperform everything else out there. (I wonder why a native app would outperform react garbage :P).

The only think that might be private yet as performant as Telegram might be some kind of XMPP but the issue with that is that mobile clients suck.

[–] THEDAEMON@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

I don't think matrix have piracy groups but yes in terms of privacy it's the best (ok maybe not the best and i should have put some reaserch into it my bad guys . i don't use it though)

[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

No, Matrix isn't the best in terms of privacy. It is a metadata disaster and Telegram clients are still more performant.

Matrix's E2EE does not, however, encrypt everything. The following information is not encrypted: Message senders, Session/device IDs, Message timestamps, Room members (join/leave/invite events), Message edit events, Message reactions, Read receipts, Nicknames, Profile pictures

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 6 points 10 months ago

ive been scared to say i dont like matrix. so many people seem in love with it.

[–] GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ask your mates with whom you connect on telegram to move to matrix

[–] THEDAEMON@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Lol from telegram my friends won't move from instagram to telegram only a few of them are available in telegram that too rarely. I am the only one not on insta in our friends group and everyone aldready thinks i am tinfoil hat guy if i tell them about frediverse and the problems with using instagram they will think i am going nuts . I just call them if i want to talk nowadays .

[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago

I've seen and heard of a few. Thing is when you join them you'll only get access to newer stuff there, the E2EE makes past messages unreadable if you haven't been there for a while. It's not like on Telegram where you get Room history access.

[–] jvrava9@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 months ago

The only piracy rooms on matrix that I know of are jc141 support and jc141 gnu/linux hackers

[–] ParetoOptimalDev@lemmy.today 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The first messenger without user IDs

Other apps have user IDs: Signal, Matrix, Session, Briar, Jami, Cwtch, etc. SimpleX does not, not even random numbers.

This radically improves your privacy.

https://simplex.chat/

[–] THEDAEMON@lemmy.ml 5 points 10 months ago

Thanks looks very promising

[–] ByroTriz@lemmy.ml 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

As far as I know Telegram is the only one with piracy-oriented channels. Maybe we could start one on Signal

[–] Asudox@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Once usernames roll out.

[–] terminhell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 10 months ago

Take a look at "Seeker". Its a client for the SoulSeeker network. Nicotine+ for desktop is nice too.

[–] BlackSkinnedJew@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 10 months ago
[–] JustUseMint@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Op regarding your edit, your title says privacy open source and security , it says nothing about for piracy. I'm aware we're on a piracy community, but that's not what your title said.

[–] THEDAEMON@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago

It is explained in the body

[–] jet@hackertalks.com -3 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] THEDAEMON@lemmy.ml 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Isn't that for privacy i want piracy

[–] ekky@sopuli.xyz 17 points 10 months ago

Most foreboding quote 2024.

[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Maybe not. https://dessalines.github.io/essays/why_not_signal.html

CIA Funding CIA → RFA → OTF → Signal. While this article by Yasha Levine gets into the details, it is no secret that the original funder of Open Whisper Systems (the previous name for signal’s development team), was the Open Technology Fund: itself publicly listed as a subsidiary of Radio Free Asia, a US state-run organization whose main goal (along with the other “Radio Free” incarnations such as Radio Free Europe, or Free Cuba Radio) is regime change for those Asian governments who don’t align with the US’s foreign policy interests.

Either way you can't recommend Signal over Telegram when it comes to features and service quality as it works very fast and handles large group chats (hundreds of people) no problem and syncs instantaneously. Signal's desktop and mobile clients are simply a pile of react and javascript garbage that can never be as fast as the native Telegram clients and usually fails at syncing messages. With Signal issues such as https://twitter.com/signalapp/status/1350631024351346689 and "signal can't display this message" are very common.

Telegram has one very good thing going on for them: they aren’t dicks when you want to delete messages. You have options that are very clear on what they do and allow you to delete messages in both sides. Other platforms, including Signal, are just shit when it comes to this and frankly that’s a security nightmare. I can't ever trust a platform that when I ask it to delete a message it may or may not work, may or may not tell the other side it was deleted.

I’m not pushing people to use Signal anymore as their Apps still suck, there’s zero investment to make them more usable and to fix the things that are half broken. To make it even better their open-source is very questionably, their server code went for an year without updates. Why would I use something that lags, underperforms, has questionable open-source practices and might be funded by the CIA / influenced in some way then?