this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
106 points (94.9% liked)

Gaming

20015 readers
716 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] theyllneverfindmehere@lemmy.world 85 points 9 months ago (1 children)

From some of the things I read it was behind a paid patreon. This likely brought the hammer down extra fast.

[–] SatouKazuma@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I'll be shocked if they don't DMCA the game itself soon.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It's an original game with original content. Nothing about the mechanics in it are patented by Nintendo or anything.

[–] SatouKazuma@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Nintendo are incredibly litigation-happy, though. They'll at least try. Calling it now.

[–] profoundninja@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

I heard on the radio that the 3d mesh of pals and mons were identical.

[–] MysticKetchup@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I doubt they can unless Palworld literally stole models from Pokemon. While some of the designs are pretty blatantly copied, if they can't prove the devs copied directly from them there's not much of a case

[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 43 points 9 months ago (3 children)

You know that Nintendo is watching this game like a hawk, looking for any possible way they can do legal action.

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I thought all of the IP was controlled by The Pokemon Company, which Nintendo owns a minority stake in. Shouldn't it be the Pokemon Company who is filing the DMCA takedown and taking legal action?

[–] ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

Nintendo is their publisher, so may have the responsibility for this sort of thing.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Really, cum, it's just the modder and not the game, so far.

[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 months ago

Which is why they're watching like hawks. To make it not "so far".

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Yeah no shit, though. Nintendo is excessive as hell with this, and Pokémon in particular is a franchise they protect like nothing else. Is it still the highest-grossing IP overall? No wonder they are onto anyone using it.

[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You mean to tell me that Nintendo don't want their kid friendly mascot waving guns around.

I don't know, sounds an awful lot like 1984.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Mario + Rabbids

And let's not pretend that Pokemon isn't a glorification of actually fighting to solve things and go up the ladder...

[–] 520@kbin.social 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Mario + Rabbids

There's a bit of a tonal difference between an unrealistic, brightly coloured cartoony hand cannon not unlike mega man and an AK47. Just saying.

And let’s not pretend that Pokemon isn’t a glorification of actual fighting to solve things and go up the ladder…

The thing is, Nintendo puts a hell of a lot of effort into pretending exactly this. Not to mention the similarities to IRL various animal fighting tournaments that are absolutely fucking barbaric.

edit: changed comparison slightly. The Rabbids guns are even more cartoony than I remembered.

[–] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Nintendo really is the Disney of video games. They had a solid idee 20 years ago and never did anything with it, except add more animals, because they know people apparently buy literally anything with a Pokémon on it. And now they are mad some nobody made a game people actually like.

[–] Algaroth@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Someone made a mod using actual pokemon and put it behind a paywall, meaning they were making money off of Nintendo's IP. Anyone would get into legal trouble for that. It doesn't have anything to do with Palworld directly. Same thing would have happened if someone charged money for a mod that added Pokemon to Fallout 4.

[–] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social -5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I'm not saying that it's right and they are wrong to go after that guy. But you know very well that they heard pokemon like game that is a huge success and they have all their lawyers behind it, to find anything they can.
I'm not big into pokemon, i played the red one 20 years ago and their game was not original at all. For me it was final fantasy 7 but you catch animals to fight with.

[–] Algaroth@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Bahamut Lagoon did it even earlier. That's not the point I'm trying to make. This lawsuit has nothing to do with Palworld other than the mod being for that game. All big corporations have lawyers on retainer to protect their IP. Nintendo being mad about Palworld is complete conjecture.

[–] ClaireDeLuna@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago

And grass is green

[–] retrolasered@lemmy.zip 6 points 10 months ago

Sega yanma says wut

[–] Rikj000@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 9 months ago

Was this mod released before the DMCA?
If so, anyone got a mirror?

[–] lowleveldata@programming.dev 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Lath@kbin.social 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Not yet. But the possibility is being looked into.

[–] rooster_butt@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

Do they have a Vaporeon clone?

[–] Sabata11792@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago

Ill give it a few weeks.