this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
68 points (86.2% liked)

News

23311 readers
4995 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In city council hearings, protests and online, a growing movement with ties to Holocaust denial is effacing history in real-time

When she first heard about Hamas’s Oct. 7 attack on Israel, Mirela Monte was “appalled.” The South Carolina real estate agent and self-described holistic healer detests violence and is horrified by war and human suffering.

But as Monte read more in Uncensored Truths, a Telegram group with 2,958 subscribers active on foreign policy and the supposed perils of vaccination, her shock turned to anger. According to the forum, the news reports were wrong: Secretly, Israel was behind the massacre.

Monte now argues the Oct. 7 attack was a “false flag” staged by the Israelis — likely with help from the Americans — to justify genocide in Gaza. “Pure evil,” she said. “Israel is like a mad dog off a leash.”

The Oct. 7 Hamas terrorist attack is among the most well-documented in history. A crush of evidence from smartphone cameras and GoPros captured Hamas’s breach of the border — a strike Israel says left about 1,200 dead, the deadliest onslaught in the country’s history.

But Oct. 7 denial is spreading. A small but growing group denies the basic facts of the attacks, pushing a spectrum of falsehoods and misleading narratives that minimize the violence or dispute its origins. Some argue the ambush was staged by the Israeli military to justify an invasion of Gaza. Others say that some 240 hostages Hamas took into Gaza were actually kidnapped by Israel. Some contend the United States is behind the plot.

Non-paywall link

all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] snek@lemmy.world 46 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

If they mean Israel did it in the sense than Netanyahu kept funding Hamas and knew about the attack years/months/days earlier and did nothing to stop it, and many killed on October 7th were killed by chaotic IDF troops told to shoot anything that moves, then yes, in a way.

But no... They had to go full conspiracy. Netanyahu didn't need to stage this, he just had to create the perfect circumstances for it to happen.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 38 points 10 months ago (4 children)

It's highly unlikely Israel made it happen...

But I wouldn't be surprised if it was a Dick Cheney thing like 9/11 where they knew it was gonna happen, and did a cost/benefit analysis and decided it was better if it happened.

Netanyahu was letting literal suitcases of cash into Gaza so Hamas could continue to exist, it's not much of a jump for them to ignore intelligence.

If they honestly didn't see this coming, then they still need to replace their government. Best case scenario they're incompetent

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I mean, Bibi was allowing Qatar to fund Hamas, and even supplied briefcases full of cash to the Qatar diplomat to give to Hamas

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

At the urging of the international community and for humanitarian purposes.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

“Anyone who wants to thwart the establishment of a Palestinian state has to support bolstering Hamas and transferring money to Hamas … This is part of our strategy – to isolate the Palestinians in Gaza from the Palestinians in the West Bank.” - Benjamin Netanyahu

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

My idle conspiracy theory is that Trump and his son-in-law sold a bunch of Israel's sensitive defense info to MBS, where it somehow made it into the hands of Hamas. Hamas had some rather detailed intel on Israeli positions at the border and I wonder how they got it. Trump probably never intended for the massacre to happen, he just wanted to earn a quick buck.

I have no proof that Trump sold this, but we know how lax he was with this info, particularly concerning Israel. Heck, he might not have even sold it, all it would take is a few well-placed operatives at Mar-a-lago to take photos of the documents Trump had at his dinner table. That would have made it all even more tragic, because it would mean that Trump sold out Israel just to brag to his friends. Would that be better or worse than getting money for it?

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

One of the reasons for the Hamas attack was Saudi moving to recognize israel and abandoning Palestine. Also Saudi is currently actively helping the israelis bypass the shipping blockade by transporting goods by truck from the port of UAE to israel through a company called TruckNet.

The Saudi's don't care about Palestine whatsoever. They just want to stack money, build clubs and drive fancy cars. They care as much about Palestine as Russians care about Ukranians, even though they often look the same.

The following nearby countries are currently actively helping israel (despite their leaders sometimes screaming differently):

  • Egypt

  • Jordan

  • Saudi Arabia

  • UAE

  • Turkey

The following are against:

  • Lebanon

  • Qatar

  • Iran

  • Yemen

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I agree with your analysis. If any information did make it to Hamas from Trump, it likely wasn't directly from MBS in a single step. But it's possible there could have been some Hamas sympathisers somewhere in the Saudi government that sent it along.

Or, as I noted, the same info was available to anyone at Mar-A-Lago. All they had to do was plant someone on the wait staff there and embed a camera somewhere on their person....

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

Saudi's probably most influential ruler Faisal was assassinated in 1975 by his very Americanized nephew after blocking oil exports to America for the Palestinian cause. Faisal also nationalized the oil industry and refused to bend the knee to the west.

The assasination was most likely a CIA operation though that does still remain in conspiracy land for about 20 years until we get to see the blacked out lines in the documents.

After Faisa's assasinationl more pro-America rulers were installed in Saudi. The current "king" MBS arrested many ministers that didn't fall in line with him when he rose to power.

Throughout his rule MBS did not seem to specifically care for anything else than money. He very much cooperates with America and israel because they are rich, and Palestine is poor. While his population does not agree with this, he buys an insane amount of weapons from America so they can't do much about it.

While a covert operation might have happened, the MBS government itself is unlikely to have acted against israel because as you can see they are actively aiding israel with Trucknet and other initiatives.

The only reason Saudi doesn't help israel more openly is because their population isn't very happy with them supporting a genocidal ethnostate slaughtering Muslims and many of these hypocritical governments are risking a revolution from their population the more openly they support israel.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I mean, don’t America fund the Taliban and Osama Bin Laden back in the 80s since they were fighting against the USSR? Only to have it backfire when the turned against us, realizing they were just pawns in our game as we conducted operations elsewhere to fuck around with the balance of power in the world?

Lot of parallels here.

But I do think Hamas did Oct 7th. They even said they did it. However, I still think “yeah, what did Israel think was going to happen?” and “it doesn’t justify genocide” just like 9/11 didn’t justify leveling Afghanistan for 20 years.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

That was different....

America funded them to fight America's enemies in a proxy war.

Netanyahu assisted other countries funding Hamas, when Hamas was trying to fight Israel. Because the threat of Hamas kept far right authoritarians in power in Israel.

They're completely different situations...

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I’m as anti-Israel as all get out and even I think that’s a stupid fucking take.

[–] Tremble@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The weird thing is that the conclusion they have reached is probably not that far off. But how the fuck did they get there?

Pretty much everything IDF says is eventually proven to be a lie. United States does blindly support Israel, to the point where Netanyahu brags about not listening to us while also knowing full well the support will continue.

[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 12 points 10 months ago

You could argue that Netanyahu let it happen (because he ignored warnings of an attack) but you would need substantial evidence before claiming that he orchestrated it.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

It's most likely the same as every time the US funded an extremist group. First they pump money into the Taliban to make them fight the Russians, but then it turns out the Taliban isn't going to be their lap dog either.

Same with Iran, which America overthrew in 1953, and then 20 years later overthrew again to install their current Shah. It works for a little while but then backfires immensely.

Netanyahu supported Hamas because they created an opportunity for him to dismantle the moderate Fatah and use Hamas as an excuse to continue colonizing. But then it turns out that Hamas is even less controllable and is actually going to fight back.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yes, yes. Everything is a false flag.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Growing group of morons tricked by Iranian propaganda.

[–] nicetriangle@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence

[–] Ferrous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 months ago

That maxim starts to break down if you have at your disposal one of the most well-equipped and well-funded intelligence agencies in the world.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

While I wouldn't put it past Mossad to finance and encourage it to keep Bibi out of corruption court (because there's nothing like a good war to distract people from domestic issues), this was all Hamas.

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

How long until we see these loons on the Fediverse, you think?