it's idiotic of CNN to report this as like a scientific disagreement. this is a disagreement among scientists about what is politically feasible. so now status quo politicians get to use this as an arrow in their quiver to dispute the necessity of even aiming for a 1.5 degree target, as if the targets are beholden to the models, and not the other way around
this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
54 points (96.6% liked)
Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.
5290 readers
591 users here now
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Nobody is bitterly divided (that's just propaganda flair) ... apart from rich people and their various pets (politicians).
Even if 1.5°C has become impossible, and I do believe it is already, I'll still fight for it.