this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
149 points (89.0% liked)

Sync for Lemmy

15148 readers
6 users here now

πŸ‘€


Welcome to Sync for Lemmy!

Download Sync for Lemmy


Welcome to the official Sync for Lemmy community.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Community Rules


1- No advertising or spam.

All types of advertising and spam are restricted in this community.



Community Credits

Artwork and community banner by: @MargotRobbie@lemmy.world


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Edited the image to stop putting the person on blast.

all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 44 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I think a simple solution of letting user turn on and off the display name will be nice.

[–] kogasa@programming.dev 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You shouldn't need to disable display names just to combat the 0.01% of people with annoying names. NFKC normalization is a better solution.

[–] Exusia@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Counterpoint, only "0.01%" of names use annoying font. If thats all it takes to be noticeable, perhaps a toggle is better, then?

[–] holycrap@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Or just turn display names of for users with special characters

[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Today I learned Lemmy accounts can have a display name. I thought it was just their account name.

[–] Exusia@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I never get to have a fancy font name.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Less jarring than emoji at least.

[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What about a couple little emoji that onomatopoeia themselves into my username?

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago

I don't know. How do you think I feel, Zipper Kangabell?

[–] cobysev@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I saw this post way back in September last year (which was quickly removed), and have been seeing this guy's custom name popping up everywhere since. It's very annoying. I'm all for blocking custom characters in display names.

[–] BananaOnionJuice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's a way to complicated suggestion

Instead do a sha256 of @

So veryfancyfakeuser@lemmy.fake

becomes

🌈cb76aae36c😘@lemmy.fake

And just to f with people add some emojis before and after.

[–] Huschke@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

AKA the Discord approach

[–] realharo@lemm.ee 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is related another issue too, does lemmy do anything to deal with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IDN_homograph_attack?

[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Not the original commenter, but it seems they're asking if lemmy is doing anything about imposters. These are all different characters: "Greek Ο (039F), Latin O (004F), and Cyrillic О (041E)" so someone could look like they have an official username, when really it's a different unicode character. Nothing to do with the actual IDN part, but moreso about the "homograph" part, or even more accurately, homoglyph

[–] lud@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

The problem (or not, depends on you) with Lemmy is that usernames aren't that unique when anyone can just setup a new instance or join a smaller one and register that username.

Most probably don't look at the instance what is looking at usernames.

Personally I couldn't care less to follow anyone on here. Who is who really doesn't matter. But maybe it does for someone.

[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I guess if someone were dumb enough to give money to a person on Lemmy just because they claimed to be Mr Beast or something. Otherwise I don't really see the "attack" part.

[–] half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

@_________ac called out

Edited

[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I edited the image to mask the name. Can you please delete this comment?

[–] half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Fair. They had posted (and then deleted) a bunch of comments to this post asking to have it taken down, which is why I edited the image. It made them very anxious.

[–] Bell@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

How about they do whatever characters or emojis they want but the size is limited to xx pixels?

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago

I would prefer to set the colours that I see, makes it easier to tell who is a commentor and who is OP

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

That's not quite as straightforward as you think. These are emojis, they ARE text, just like letters from various languages...etc are also text.

It would be a hell of a lot easier just to ban non-ascii characters than to start changing the font size based on each individual character. This would also be something that every single client would have to implement themselves which they definitely would not, the rendering performance implications would turn it into more work than you would think.

[–] Land_Strider@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Not gonna lie I like them so far. Helps understanding there is a person with some flair to them on the other side of the cold text.

However, customization should be a thought twice when implementing. However much anyone should be able to customize and make their stuff different, there should be options for the others to turn their own viewing experience into a rigid framework.

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 5 points 10 months ago

Yeah, would really appreciate a feature to toggle these nicks. Hope LJ is back from his current break soon

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't mind them and I don't understand what the outrage is about. I've been able to identify some of these individuals across threads because they tend to stand out and I find that very endearing from a community POV. I'd rather have some form of personalization rather than slapping everyone with a uniform.

[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I don't think anyone is outraged. It's just an annoyance. I'm happily scrolling and reading titles and then N O T I C E M E!. It's a distraction.

A name alone is personalization enough.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

These posts sound more than an annoyance.

A name alone is personalization enough.

I don't think so. People literally pay for personalization and a customized experience. If it were enough, we wouldn't be here asking to normalize usernames in the first place.

[–] Tangent5280@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

How about just adding it in as a rendering option on the client side, making it so that they keep their usernames, but you can see the normal letter versions?

[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's literally what I'm asking for with this post. πŸ€”

[–] Tangent5280@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Ah, sorry, I didn't see the community you posted this in.