this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
89 points (100.0% liked)

Beehaw Support

2794 readers
1 users here now

Support and meta community for Beehaw. Ask your questions about the community, technical issues, and other such things here.

A brief FAQ for lurkers and new users can be found here.

Our September 2024 financial update is here.

For a refresher on our philosophy, see also What is Beehaw?, The spirit of the rules, and Beehaw is a Community


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.


if you can see this, it's up  

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Compiling this data was not as hard as I expected, let's go through the data and the shiny graphs!

Age of Beeple

Most are above 24! Seems we got an older average age compared to a lot of social media. It would be interesting to see how many came here with experiences from independent forums before Reddit.

Where Beeple reside

This one's a big graph. Though we can notice most people are from the US. Would be nice to see more countries represented though a big part of it likely has to do with language. (You will need to open the big graph in another tab, it's too big to show properly.)

Gender identity of Beeple

So, as expected, mostly men. However, less than expected which is nice to see. There should be outreach to at least equalize this.

Sexual orientation of Beeple

This is kinda surprising. It seems we managed to get a lot more LGBTQ+ people than expected considering most of you all come from Reddit - so this is nice to see. This is most likely because of our focus on a safe space.

Whiteness of Beeple

As expected, mostly white which is unfortunate. I think there's outreach to be done in that regard as well.

Neurodivergence of Beeple

We seem to have a really surprising amount of neurodivergent people! Definitely nice to see.

Beeple with disabilities

I.. have no idea how to interpret this data so I'll just say, shiny graph.

Beeple's awareness of the Fediverse

Most knew about the fediverse but still a good 20% had not heard about it so glad to see you all managed to find your way here!

How Beeple have been dealing with Beehaw

It seems most people feel relatively confident in their ability to use Beehaw and most people seem to enjoy it. That makes me really happy to see. Feels rewarding, feels good.

Conclusion

I wanna thank everyone for the feedback about the survey and its questions - we'll do better next time! I'm glad we did this survey because it shows the areas to work on in terms of outreach! Thank you all for your participation!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TimTheEnchanter@beehaw.org 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Love seeing the results from the survey, and also love the word “beeple.”

[–] pushka@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Beeple is also an amazing 3d digital artist

[–] Kindajustlikewhat@beehaw.org 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I just want to pipe in and and say thank you for caring about diversity. Lots of discourse here about how that's hostile to white people. In my opinion purposefully misinterpreting "unfortunate" to mean "white people not welcome" is a perfect representation of why WHY diversity matters.

Because as a POC it's clear to me that there are valid reasons why a white-dominated community can be... Uncomfortable. Like the very comments here that push back and pretend that race isn't a issue and that POC are racist ones for caring about it. Not bothering at all to understand where it's coming from and why it matters.

Edit: I didn't write this at first but I can't bite my tongue anymore. White people who get hositle over this have suffered from main character syndrome for way too long. You feel unwelcome because some online community simply wants more diversity? Why is it that in your mind one more POC means one less white person? Speaks more about your world view than anything else.

I've felt unwelcome my entire life because people resent my intrusion into their white bubbles. The whole point of Beehaw is that it's inclusive. I'm a snowflake who wants her safe space.

[–] alyaza@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

In my opinion purposefully misinterpreting “unfortunate” to mean “white people not welcome” is a perfect representation of why WHY diversity matters.

it's a good indicator we are going to continue to ask that question on the survey forever, for what that's worth. very clearly a "the beatings will continue until morale improves" question because oh god, some of the responses here

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] nlm@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Thank you for writing this!

As a straight white male it's a bit hard to feel your words carry any weight in discussions like this.

I'm here trying to be an ally to ant decent human being who might feel they need one! <3

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Kwakigra@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As a fellow snowflake, I've got your back.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JCDenton@beehaw.org 21 points 1 year ago (9 children)

What is 'white' exactly and why is it unfortunate?

Where I am from, we don't make these distinctions on the color of a person. That and the fact that unless we are quantifying somehow the 'shade' of the skin color it's impossible to make any serious category.

I've always thought that the way americans divide people by color is really dumb and very antiquated, even bordering immorality.

I wouldn't bring that for future statistics. I don't understand why race is important in a medium where we can't see each others.

[–] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago

What is 'white' exactly and why is it unfortunate?

'White' is an artificially constructed privileged racial caste predicated on and necessitating anti-Black violence.

It is a legal and social ingroup whose borders expand and contract as needed to preserve itself.

Its over representation is "unfortunate" in so far as any lack of diversity-of-experience will make for a less rich community for all involved, but specifically having membership skew towards the more privileged members of a hierarchy can damage that community by having it tend toward obviousness of how its own privileges and position in society can affect its worldview.

A member from the community might, for example, say they "don't see race" and not understand how that position itself upholds white supremacy.
They might suggest racism can be solved by not talking about race and get no pushback from a community whose members by-and-large have no experience of being subject to racial discrimination themselves.

Generally, there are things we all don't know we don't know and the more similar those around us are to us, the more overlap there is likely to be in those things.

A diverse community is less likely to be oblivious to its own lack of knowledge.

[–] ConstableJelly@beehaw.org 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm white, and I just took that to mean they'd like to see more diversity. As in, it's not unfortunate that members are white so much as unfortunate they haven't attracted more diverse representation (if I'm right, I do think it could have been worded better).

And to be clear, in contexts like this, no one is dividing people "by color," but by experience. While race may be largely imaginary biologically, it has been and continues to be a major variable related to a person's economics, education, housing, etc. due to the external factors that do treat race as significant (i.e., as an American, we have historically and systemically discriminated against non-white people in pretty much every facet of civic and social life).

That stuff matters to...a lot of people. But it's not at the expense of white people--we can all be happy to see diversity in our communities. It's a net gain for everyone.

[–] Lionir@beehaw.org 13 points 1 year ago

Yes - I'm white as well. It's more so that I want to see more diverse representation because I believe that a majority white (also majority men) tends to push out people of colour as they will be a minority group.

For example, if a thread about abortion (an issue that affects mostly women) was filled with men talking about it - it's unlikely that a women would want to comment there. I believe the same would apply with a majority of people being white in a thread about BLM for example.

I think it could've been worded better but I didn't really think about the wording of these much at all.

[–] JCDenton@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I understand.

I guess part of me wanted to get away from the same pervasive US politics that's plaguing reddit. I had hopes that maybe we wanted to build a less american community and more inclusive of other points of view but it seems we are going to fall back to the same thing here.

[–] alyaza@beehaw.org 14 points 1 year ago

I guess part of me wanted to get away from the same pervasive US politics that’s plaguing reddit.

i hope you understand this but: asking whether people are white or not isn't US politics, it might literally be the single most important sociological question in the world because whether you're white or not for the vast majority of living human beings immediately predetermines a huge chunk of your status globally

[–] shanghaibebop@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

IMO the interesting part is that this is not American politics. Ironically out of all the western countries, the US actually talks about it the most, but the legacy of colonialism and white supremacy is still taken as the default in much of the world. Most folks in Europe are quite blind to it since it’s really taken as the default. It’s a pretty global issue, but very few places do people openly confront it.

[–] can@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

How does wanting to increase diversity result in fewer points of view?

[–] ConstableJelly@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah, sorry, I gave an American example because I'm American, but Alyaza said it best... race and its significance is not an exclusively American phenomenon by a long shot. But I sympathize with American fatigue, we do dominate the discussion a lot 😀

[–] azureeight@beehaw.org 13 points 1 year ago

That's a lot of words for you to say you literally have zero understanding how the lived experience of people of color is very different.

Beehaw wants to be better than reddit, which was mostly straight white men voices at the detriment of everyone else. It's really dishonest as even in the EU the loved experience of people of color is different.

It's really ignorant and narrow-minded of you as white people are a minority worldwide but the majority in wealth and tech. A space that celebrates people of color is rare and why oh fucking why do you HAVE to make it about you?

[–] alyaza@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

What is ‘white’ [...] Where I am from, we don’t make these distinctions on the color of a person. That and the fact that unless we are quantifying somehow the ‘shade’ of the skin color it’s impossible to make any serious category.

i absolutely promise that your country does, whether you are conscious of that or not. whiteness, in any case, is a social construct (and even if it wasn't, race and ethnicity are also basically arbitrary) so you're not going to ever get a singular, satisfactory answer on this. the whole point at a sociological level is that it's an amorphous, hegemony-based category that transcends political barriers and basically divides the world into "haves" and "have-nots". it doesn't make sense because it can't ever, it's arbitrary, and it's not a "serious" category because it's not really intended to be.

unfortunately, on that basis it's also the single most important (and unambiguous) descriptor of one's racial identity in a global context--so we're kind of locked into using it here because it is actually really important to know what our community looks like, and we don't literally want to use American census groupings.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] heliodorh@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't understand why race is important in a medium where we can't see each others.

Because people bring their personal experiences, histories, and identities to every discussion. Having a folks with a range of different experiences and identities contributing, imo, greatly benefits discussions; I want to hear multiple perspectives on an issue (within reason of course - I'm not interested in engaging with racists, transphobes, fascists, etc., for obvious reasons). If a community is very one-sided (ex. Mostly white folks, mostly men, and so on) how can I curate a well-balanced perspective on a given topic? I only know what I know, and if everybody around me is coming from a similar background and we're all saying the same shit - what kind of discussion is that?

[–] JCDenton@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Good point, but then you are generalizing about 'white' men like they are all the same and they all have the same point of view.

And by saying that it's unfortunate that the majority of users are 'white' it looks as if they wished these users weren't here.

[–] can@beehaw.org 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm a cis white man and I felt no offence when reading that. I also embrace diversity and I'm curious why you don't?

We could build a community of men, each having a unique points of view, but none of them would be a woman's.

[–] realChem@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

We could build a community of men, each having a unique points of view, but none of them would be a woman’s.

Well said! Hope you don't mind if I steal this for future use, I think it illustrates the point very well. Could be useful in some real-life interactions, I'm thinking.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gaywallet@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The interesting thing about words is that we made them all up. Different people feel very differently about certain words in certain contexts. Slang and vernacular are perfect examples of this - we learn how people are using existing words in new ways all the time, and we adjust appropriately. What people don't always recognize, however, is that words fall in and out of fashion constantly and how they are applied are also cultural artifacts. Prolific artists, famous movies, and important political figures all shape the way we interpret specific words - the cultural zeitgeist controls more than we are often aware.

Rather than assuming that unfortunate means it must be negative, because that's the experience you've had when that word was used around you, I'd suggest asking questions and assuming good faith. You could ask what do you mean, when you use the word unfortunate before jumping to conclusions. Perhaps English isn't the posters first language, or perhaps English in the country they are from use the word unfortunate in a very different way. Questions and good faith, rather than assumptions and escalation can quickly solve any questions you have and everyone leaves happy.

I think this is also a perfect example of why diversity is so amazing to be around and experience because you get exposed to so many more ways to utilize language, so many different backgrounds, and so many diverse points of view 😄

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 1993_toyota_camry@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don’t understand why race is important in a medium where we can’t see each others.

I think it matters if the demographics of the site skew strongly from the demographics of the countries represented, as that suggests something about the site might be offputting to certain people.

Though I don't think this is the case based on the results?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hybridhavoc@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Where I am from, we don’t make these distinctions on the color of a person.

Not everybody is from wherever you're from. There's a chart up there for that, too.

[–] JCDenton@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you don't care about people from other countries and you want to bring US politics to this site AGAIN like in reddit? Got it.

[–] hybridhavoc@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You seem to go out of your way to read and response to everything in the most argumentative way possible. Basically every comment I see from you is this way. In case you are not aware, people are not obligated to talk to you. Please discover a new way to interact with people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Onii-Chan@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Yeah, this whole thing REALLY rubbed me the wrong way. I'm going to get shit for this, but it comes off as really sexist, racist and - as someone who is neurodivergent - kinda condescending.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HeapOfDogs@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago (19 children)

My only feedback is the words choices here were, unfortunate. It comes across as the author found undesired demographics which felt not inclusive.

In my opinion this is not being nice.

I am a minority in some parts of the graph and a majority in others. Reading this left my feeling I wasn't welcome here which I have felt ever day before reading this post.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] Tsuki@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It seems like I'm probably the rarest Beeple here, since I'm from Vietnam (which is not even in the graph), and I'm not even 16 yet LOL

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] possum@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Maybe an interesting question: how does this compare to the diversity of admins? I guess doing an actual survey is bad for your anonimity, but some idea could be cool

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] quasar@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Us Aussies sneak into the top 5, yay.

As for the age thing, I'll just say I have posted to usenet :)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Parsnip8904@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

I understand the arguments given by many of us regarding why knowing the demographics is important. Maybe I shouldn't feel this way, but I bear the burden of having to deal with the crap that comes with being at the intersection of many of the categories that are discriminated against in real life, and reddit/lemmy was/is a place where I could engage with others while not having to shoulder most of that. So it bothers me a little that it is being brought up here too, albeit indirectly. On the other hand I can imagine how this would be different if there was actual discriminatory behaviour in beehaw itself.

[–] renard_roux@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

Thanks for sharing this, very interesting!

Also, shout-out to my 7 Danish homies! We almost made the graph! 😅🇩🇰

[–] chloyster@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Thanks for posting the results! Glad to be a part of this community 😊

load more comments
view more: next ›