this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
279 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3323 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 87 points 10 months ago

“I’m convinced there are two people Putin pays; Rorabacher and Trump.” - future Speaker of the house Kevin McCarthy in 2016

“Shhh! STFU!” - then-current Speaker of the House Paul Ryan

[–] theodewere@kbin.social 58 points 10 months ago

compromised? JFC, they tried to overthrow the fucking government itself.. they're enemies outright..

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 57 points 10 months ago

Bruh. It’s obvious.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 54 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Does the person blackmailing them have a name very similar to a popular Canadian dish made with french fries?

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 6 points 10 months ago

I think it's funny that both Trump and Putin have names that are euphemisms for farting

[–] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Btw, I know it's recognized as a Canadian dish, and Canada likes to flex it, but just wanted to say in passing, it's a Quebec dish!

[–] TIMMAY@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago (3 children)

At the risk of showing my ignorance, isnt Quebec in Canada?

[–] OfficeMonkey@lemmy.today 28 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Currently, but they keep trying.

[–] TIMMAY@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

is it like a texas secession thing or a legitimate thing?

[–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

As far as I can tell, somewhere between the two.

[–] TIMMAY@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

well to anyone personally connected to the issue, Im sorry if I treated it lightly

[–] steakmeout@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

It is but it’s pronounced with an accent.

[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 10 months ago

It’s kind of a Texas situation, except they treat it as more than a political motto.

[–] Jagger2097@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

From my experience they are in Old Orchard Beach

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

it's a Quebec dish!

Right so... Canadian.

[–] boydster@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago
[–] dudinax@programming.dev 3 points 10 months ago

We can tell by the name.

[–] Perhapsjustsniffit@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

Quebecers becoming Ontarions. That's fucked. Stop it now.

[–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Unlikely, this is more of the domestic and close ally variety e.g. Epstein's handlers/killers, or of that same caliber. The kind of people who can waive off, or prevent, an FBI counterintelligence operation from getting in the way...

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 53 points 10 months ago

Until lobbying is eliminated and campaign finance severely overhauled, assume they're all compromised. It's just a matter of who they're bought and paid for.

[–] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 49 points 10 months ago (1 children)

US: We could easily destroy Russia in traditional warfare, we have the best weapons, we will never stop fighting them

Russia: Here’s a suitcase full of money

US: Oh, I love those! Never mind, do whatever you want

[–] Okokimup@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I read this in Ryan George's voice.

[–] squidman@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Producer Guy: "Sounds like destroying a democracy from the inside is going to be incredibly difficult." Writer Guy: "Actually it's gonna be super easy. Barely an inconvenience." Producer Guy: "Oh, really!" Writer Guy: holds up a suitcase full of money

[–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Oh, man. I would love to watch that! Wow wow wow wow wow.

[–] str82L@lemmy.world 46 points 10 months ago

For many of these politicians, based on their actions, they're compromised, evil, stupid or insane. Quite possibly all the above.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Spit it out then Mr Burchett! Didn't you take an oath to protect the country?

[–] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Only from progress

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 15 points 10 months ago

Given how little money it takes to sway the politicians votes I'm amazed it has taken this long

I'm still all for crowd funding the buying of politicians votes at this point. The politician will think it's some private benefactor or multinational patrolling them.

[–] Sharpiemarker@startrek.website 13 points 10 months ago

some fellow members have been compromised.

You don't say?!

[–] TheDeepState@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Well, who are they?

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I wonder when Putin will release the videos he has on Trump ;-)

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

The video can be used against his children. So I doubt it will go out any time soon.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Never. Putin doesn't need the videos he has on Trump. Trump isn't a victim of kompromat; he's a fanboi. He's betraying American democracy and doing Putin's bidding simply because he wants to, not because he's being coerced to!

[–] zzzz@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

“Absolutely. And other powers. It doesn’t have to be foreign powers.”

NSA has entered the chat.

[–] Doesnotexist@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I trust the NSA a lot more than, for example, the Koch brothers, or some nameless billionaire none of us have heard of.

I rich dick can do more damage than a bunch of government employees. Giant conspiracies just don’t exist.

[–] Willy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

The Koch bros do fund some decent pbs shows.