this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2024
84 points (98.8% liked)

politics

19072 readers
4288 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

House and Senate leaders on Sunday announced a spending deal for government funding in 2024, the first step to averting a shutdown later this month even as that threat still looms.

The topline numbers agreed to by House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer include $1.59 trillion for fiscal year 2024, with $886 billion for defense spending and $704 in non-defense spending. They also agreed to a $69 billion side deal in adjustments that will go toward non-defense domestic spending.

The side deal brings the non-defense spending figure to nearly $773 billion, a Democratic source told CNN, with spending close to $1.66 trillion overall.

While their agreement on funding levels will reduce the chances of a shutdown, there are still major hurdles facing Congress ahead of two funding deadlines: January 19 and February 2.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 31 points 10 months ago (1 children)

According to the Washington Post ;the agreement between Johnson and Schumer is for the same spending numbers that McCarthy and Biden negotiated back in May/June as part of the debt ceiling deal - and protects spending levels for both domestic and military programs.

It is also certain that Johnson is going to face a rebellion from the hardcore portion of his caucus. It will rely on Democratic votes to pass (Cue the calls for a motion to vacate....)

[–] Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

I don't think this is really an agreement at all.

Johnson's statement said it was agreement of the top line numbers for 2024 and that now negotiations will begin. So this is just like the shit they did last year -- Democrats have negotiated what they think the final numbers are going to be while Republicans think they've negotiated the upper bound and are now free to use any and all leverage to push the number as low as possible.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn't be surprised if this kept going on every quarter.

[–] synae@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 10 months ago

So much looming

[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 4 points 10 months ago

This is just the new Republican tactic. Filibuster or Govt shutdown tantrums.

Party of Law and Order.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


House and Senate leaders on Sunday announced a spending deal for government funding in 2024, the first step to averting a shutdown later this month even as that threat still looms.

Schumer, meanwhile, said in a statement with House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries that the agreement on non-defense discretionary spending will allow Democrats to “protect key domestic priorities like veterans benefits, health care and nutrition assistance from the draconian cuts sought by right-wing extremists.”

“It will also allow us to keep the investments for hardworking American families secured by the legislative achievements of President Biden and Congressional Democrats,” the pair wrote.

“We have made clear to Speaker Mike Johnson that Democrats will not support including poison pill policy changes in any of the twelve appropriations bills put before the Congress.”

President Joe Biden said Sunday, “The bipartisan funding framework congressional leaders have reached moves us one step closer to preventing a needless government shutdown and protecting important national priorities.”

“It reflects the funding levels that I negotiated with both parties and signed into law last spring,” Biden said in a statement.


The original article contains 458 words, the summary contains 181 words. Saved 60%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] grimsolem@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 months ago

Ah, so veterans' benefits don't fall under defense spending. Makes sense.

Also a question: That $886 billion is ~12% of the federal budget. Considering it's ~55% of the amount allocated here, how/where is the rest of the federal budget allocated?