this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
299 points (97.2% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35405 readers
1111 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] panchzila@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Trees are a luxury, growing something like that takes time. I hope they really have a good reason for doing what they did.

[–] AshDene@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And a public good. They keep things cooler when it's really hot out, keep things warmer when it's really cool out, mildly improve air quality, reduces noise pollution, provide measurable mental health benefits, and so on.

Around here removing big trees is illegal, on your property or not. I'm a fan.

Open soil instead of pavement also helps reduce flooding during heavy rainfall since the ground absorbs water instead of just making it run off to somewhere else.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] torknorggren@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago

The reason is probably "raking is work." I see this shit all the time in Florida, where we really need more shade trees.

[–] socphoenix@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago

Considering they also took out the shrubs I’m betting not, though that tree closest to the house the roots may have been affecting the foundation I guess.

[–] ShlorpianMafia@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It legit looks like half of the weed dispensaries in my city. Who tf would actually do that to their home tho

[–] dismalnow@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

I feel like the car in the picture is important context. I'm thinking that the home was turned into a business, and the pavement is for parking

[–] flyingschnitzel@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, the rare parking without any car access.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Tagger@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why don't they like trees?

[–] STRIKINGdebate2@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Capitalism has drained their soul. They don't think artistically. They don't think about nature. They don't see beauty. Their art is corporate art.

[–] brandacus@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Capitalism is when ugly house

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] RandoMcGuvins@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

Just steal the image and put the source in the body text. That way you're not redirecting everyone to reddit. Sort of defeats the purpose of the protests.

[–] axtualdave@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

It's like they heard lawns were bad for the environment, but stopped listening at the part about replacing it with native plants.

[–] marswarrior@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would have left the trees alone, but removed the grass and covered it with small black and grey stones. That way the trees would still look nice, and the rain water can still pass through the rocks and prevent flooding, unlike this mess. This looks like a business now, it’s not a home anymore.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jg1i@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I personally don't like it, but I respect their right to do whatever the fuck they want with their property. If they want a fugly house, then that's their right.

[–] Korne127@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Honestly, no. At least where I live, they're finally starting to do something against gravel gardens. They are illegal here (have been for decades but no-one did anything against it) and they're absolutely terrible for the environment and destroying green space (additionally to them being very bad for bees and further sealing the floor which is awful when any flood happens). Luckily people shouldn't be able to do absolutely everything they want if it hurts everyone so much.

[–] Neato@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Gravel gardens seal the ground? I thought it was just gravel on top of dirt.

I would prefer housing authorities don't require manicured grass lawns. They are so expensive to keep up and repair, especially since many don't use native grass species so they need watering in the summer if you don't want them to go brown.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 8 points 1 year ago

🎵 They paved paradise and put up a parking lot 🎵

[–] leaskovski@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

It should actually be an offence for someone to do this. That change from garden to hard standing will cause issues with any drains and probably cause flooding.

[–] mondoman712@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago
[–] MoltenBoron@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago
[–] ekZepp@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

"Bad" taste for "bad" people 🤷‍♀️

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] prettydarknwild@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

now its a gulag

[–] catwhowalksbyhimself@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

People are focusing on the house in the middle, but if you look at he whole picture, it isn't that one house. It's every single house on both streets. It's not just this specific owner. If this were the US, I'd suspect a HOA at work.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Gangreless@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sure they didn't turn it into a shop? Those definitely look like they were made into display windows

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mykl@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The house was horrible enough to start with; a characterless inter-war bungalow with fake timbering and fake leaded glass. The conversion is just differently horrible.

For me it's the destruction of the garden that warrants it being here. I know it's the UK so the sun isn't always available (edit: just seen the Zoopla link, it's Bolton, so change "always" to "ever") , but losing shade and shelter like that is a tragedy in any climate.

[–] lynny@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I mean I hate lawns as much as the next person, but I don't think the solution is to salt the earth and cover it in concrete.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] entropicshart@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Never understood homes that pave/block out all the greenery; makes the home depressing af all for saving some 30min of upkeep per week.

[–] Bannanable@lemmy.fmhy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

You don't even need that. Personally a overgrown garden looks better than no garden.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Spacebar@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Dendrophobia? Agrostophobia? Botanophobia? All 3 wrapped into one tangle of neurosis?

[–] venoft@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Just before the previous owners of my house decided to put the house on the market they painted all wood inside (stairs, doors, door frames, window frames, skirting) pitch black.

Yes thanks, I enjoy living in a cave. Removing, sanding and painting all that will take me 100s of hours.

Oh, and it was done with the cheapest paint possible while painting over all hinges, locks and sometimes windows.

[–] Liempong_Pagong@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 year ago

They're covering the blood spatters. And needed to do it fast and cheap.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hydra@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It's been ruined.

[–] Groovygravygrape@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

100% agree this is a terrible looking house- I think the function of the raised platform must be because it's on a dangerous corner or intersection, so it acts as a safety structure from vehicles. They would've gotten special planning permission to do something like that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AtheistAndroid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lol did you just link to a reddit post from Lemmy?

[–] marswarrior@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah they did. it’s hilarious

[–] phillycodehound@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

WTFF. That's terrible

[–] Rhabuko@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Maybe the new owners are allergic to nature? 🙃

[–] MiddleWeigh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Is that cement? Oof

[–] Kabaka@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I found a real estate listing for the house (yes, you could own this beauty), but I don't know if posting it would count as doxxing per community rules, so I won't. In any case, this is not a business.

They want £300k+. Based on what was written, the whole idea was minimal maintenance and maximum room for parking. The back yard/back "garden" is the same as the front: just a bunch of tile. The interior is less offensive, but just what you'd expect: very modern, lots of black and white and bold shapes.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

and maximum room for parking

Yet another example of what car-brain does to a person.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›