this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
374 points (96.3% liked)

World News

39032 readers
2943 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 258 points 10 months ago (41 children)

There's a war going on right now in Ukraine, helping them win it will make Russia launching a next war less likely and further off.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 135 points 10 months ago (3 children)

This is exactly what I am thinking as well. Russia is clearly threatening the stability of the EU right now. If the EU wants to send a strong signal against aggression and meddling, it needs support Ukraine in a way that makes it clear to any would-be-adversary, that the EU is willing and capable to defend itself and its allies.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (40 replies)
[–] thorcik@lemmy.world 51 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] mrfriki@lemmy.world 45 points 10 months ago (6 children)

My history teacher used to say that over the course of history every generation faces a full scale war that directly impact them. Looking through the last couple of centuries that seems about right. I haven't been in a war yet and I'm a45 years old so, yeah, I'm kinda scared.

This same teacher also used to say that the only "good" thing about a civil war is that the country that faces it nerves goes through another one ever again. Seeing how things are good in the United States now I'm starting to think that this teacher might be wrong.

[–] thedarkfly@feddit.nl 39 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, your teacher seemed to deal in absolutes: "it always happens" or "it will never happen again". I think that events can always happen (again) but they don't have to.

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Ah, so this history teacher was a Sith Lord!?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BenadrylChunderHatch@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Plenty of countries have had multiple civil wars.

[–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

I was going to say, I'm pretty sure this is just historically inaccurate in addition to the fact that there can always be a first for anything.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] piecat@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

We won't have other one*

*While the generations affected are alive.

Once the living memories are gone it's much harder to prevent, since anyone can argue a stance from a history book.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This reminds me of how WWI was at one point known as 'the war to end all wars'.

How fucking naive were the people who really thought that!

[–] thawed_caveman@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

they were hopeful...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 43 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Article 5

“The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognized by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.

Any such armed attack and all measures taken as a result thereof shall immediately be reported to the Security Council. Such measures shall be terminated when the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to restore and maintain international peace and security.'

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] M137@lemmy.world 40 points 10 months ago (7 children)

Why has every comment here been downvoted?

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 48 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Russia troll farms I imagine.

[–] Zoidsberg@lemmy.ca 65 points 10 months ago

We're big enough that troll farms think we're relevant! We did it, Lemmy!

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Suoko@feddit.it 11 points 10 months ago

The usual money flow. What future generation will be able to stop these should-be-retired chiefs?

[–] sebinspace@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago (5 children)

And into the apocalypse we go

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

Oh no not again

[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

Why Berlin? Why?

[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 10 months ago
[–] Sorgan71@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (6 children)

Knowing germany, this sounds like a threat

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›