this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
2193 points (98.4% liked)

Memes

45520 readers
1550 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 178 points 10 months ago (19 children)

I don't need a 27-page novel to know the temperature and time to cook something. I also don't want to he directed to Pintrest and be required to have an account. Honestly, I've started using Bing more often.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 127 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah honestly. The Google ad-based search system created a set of incentives that just destroyed the internet! I miss the days when people created their own fun little quirky websites like Ian's Shoelace Site. That used to be every site on the internet!

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I don’t need a 27-page novel to know the temperature and time to cook something.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/recipe-filter/

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

The Google habit is hit the third link, scroll to fourth paragraph, your answer should be around there somewhere.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] De_Narm@lemmy.world 152 points 10 months ago (10 children)

That's not only a search engine problem in itself - websites also got worse in general to appeal to googles algorithm. Which means that other search engines would show similar crap, unfortunately.

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 79 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I remember in the early days of the internet Alta Vista search worked quite well. It was easy to find what you wanted, and find new things relevant to your interests - and so it became very popular. Unfortunately, Alta Vista only worked well if people made their websites in good faith. It was searching meta-tags and text on the page; and so when greedy people wanted to get more traffic on their website, they found it easy to exploit Alta Vista's search. As more and more people started exploiting the system, the search got worse and worse.

I remember the day I switched to using Google. I was searching for some C programming stuff on Alta Vista with technical words - and the results had more porn sites than programming sites. Like, wtf. Obviously that search doesn't work anymore. It stopped working because arseholes were exploiting it.

And now, pretty much the same thing is happening to Google. Their algorithm worked better for longer than what Alta Vista was doing, but it seems that self-interested people have kind of cracked the system, and now the results are mostly just junk instead of useful stuff. (Note, I stopped using Google several years ago. I've been using Duck Duck Go. But you're right that the problem is more widespread than just Google.)

[–] sub_ubi@lemmy.ml 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Profit motives are good at ruining social platforms; society.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] greenskye@lemm.ee 41 points 10 months ago

Yep the whole Internet feels like a dying mall. There are still some places I go for specific needs, but I'd say my casual browsing of any kind just keeps getting smaller.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 127 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (17 children)

YALL NEED KAGI.COM

Also:

Decentralise and build a toolbox, it's better for your brain.

[–] BulbasaurBabu@lemmings.world 21 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Keep your links, I'm going back to askjeeves

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world 84 points 10 months ago (2 children)

SEO abuse has ruined the internet. We could've had something good.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ElPussyKangaroo@lemmy.world 44 points 10 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 35 points 10 months ago (21 children)

What are y'all searching for that Google search isn't working for you anymore? Like, genuinely, I'm baffled by this.

[–] krudorass@sh.itjust.works 61 points 10 months ago (8 children)

A typical example is more popular searches crowding out actual answers to your question.

I have had this a lot of times with IT problems, I am a sys admin and google a ton of things related to my job. But 5 out of 10 times some keyword will relate to a simple problem many people have with their pc and all relative answers to my exact question get drowned out.

Google anything related to 'laptop monitor turn off' and you will only find results telling you how to turn of sleep when you close the lid. No matter how much syntaxing or formatting you do with your search

[–] Nommer@sh.itjust.works 34 points 10 months ago

I'm not even a sysadmin, just a power user and this infuriates me to no end. I gave up on a search just a couple days ago because I kept getting bottom tier answers. Like thanks but I already know how to use my computer, now tell me how to fix this problem.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] doctorn@r.nf 21 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Torrents, modded apk's,...

Check out my results for some chinese download service called "Content Plaza" for example:

Google:

Yandex:

Like, 2? On the 'entire' internet? 2? Right...

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago

I just get tired of jumping through hoops to find what I'm searching for... Instead of what Google wants me to see

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 29 points 10 months ago

'We didn't find many results matching the terms you wrote.'

THAT'S WHY I FUCKING WROTE THEM.

[–] dotslashme@infosec.pub 29 points 10 months ago (8 children)

Haven't used Google search for years.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] firadin@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I feel like 90+% of the time I use Google, it's just because it's more convenient than going to the actual website I want. Like if I want a Wikipedia article about a movie, it turns out it's faster to type in the movie name in Google and click than go to Wikipedia and search the movie.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] obinice@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago (10 children)

Honestly people keep saying this but I just don't find it to be true. Google is a vital daily resource for me, and usually the best way for me to find most things.

Is this because I don't use social networks? Are people somehow using Instagram or TikTok as search engines to find what they're looking for? It feels like people just use social networks these days and nothing else, so maybe that's it?

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 78 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Let's say I want to find an aftermarket built-in air jack kit for a car. Nevermind why, but let's say it's what I want to find.

So I look up car air lift jack. Google spits back a grid of floor air bag jacks for sale, a stack of videos of floor air bag jacks by people trying to sell them, Another grid of floor air bag jacks for sale, then finally a couple of the kind that go on a car, and godammnit another grid of floor air bag jacks for sale, finally sponsored posts for floor jacks or the wrong kind, Amazon ads for the same thing, ads for brands of the floor jacks, and more, more, more, makers of the wrong thing, lowes, home depot, walmart...it's all wrong.

So the very next words out of your mouth are "Well, you used the wrong search term!" No, not really, but let's try getting rid of "bag", because that seems to be a big incorrect return on the search. So in goes "-bag" to the search term. What does that get us?

The exact same fucking thing. "-" is meaningless anymore.

So that's google now.

Want help with a tech problem?

Wade through a stack of a dozen shitty youtube videos 10 minutes long each (because google pays more for ad space, longer videos have more space, so those get pushed to the top, and a problem that would take a paragraph of text to solve now becomes a shitty video with blather, subscribe, previous videos, like, other videos, and 2 minutes of actual help), a bunch of sponsored links to tech makers that have shit to do with your problem, and SEO sites like solveyourtechproblem.com or wefixitgood.com or whatever BS name for sites that consist of boilerplate help like "did you turn it off and on again?" Maybe after all that you'll get an out of date reddit or github list of posts that don't have anything to do with your exact issue. So you put it in quotes, that should work, right?

"It looks like there aren't many great matches for your search" says google.

Why? I dunno. Not enough returns on the search to cram ads, sponsored links, shit for sale in?

Google is shit. I've switched to DDG. It has it's own frustrations, but at least I don't have to put up with Google cramming every ad and sponsored link in front of me along with garbage SEO sites. Google's heyday has ended.

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago

The troubleshooting you list here second is my primary use for a Google search and it is completely garbage. Just like you say, it's a bunch of trash SEO sites that don't really address the problem so most of the time I add reddit to the search to get legit answers. Because reddit has a garbage search engine, of course.

Though I have to admit I have given up on that and just use DDG to search for Reddit results. It used to be that I'd start on DDG and if it didn't have what I need I'd go to Google, but Google search has gotten so bad that I almost never bother anymore.

[–] AlfredEinstein@lemmy.world 36 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I've been doing a lot of searches lately about running, picking shoes, overpronation, training schedules, etc.

Straight google searches (ones that would have returned worthwhile results even ten years ago) are all trying to sell me something, or are AI generated content filler garbage.

I have to add "reddit" to every search in order to get real information from normal people.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] maniel@lemmy.ml 27 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

not sure about other languages, but with Polish Google is still the most useful one, Bing and DDG don't even hold a candle to it, that said i still think Google went to shit hard

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] unreasonabro@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago

Of course it has, and this effect was completely foreseeable, and indeed, was foreseen, from the very moment they decided to whore themselves out with that IPO. They took their role as custodian of the baby internet and became a pimp.

Stop calling it anything else. As a musician, I promise you, trying to promote yourself online feels like prostitution. If you've ever tried, then you know too. The only difference is if I were a prostitute I might actually make some money back.

[–] LaserTurboShark69@sh.itjust.works 21 points 10 months ago (15 children)

Is DuckDuckGo the best alternative?

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (10 children)

I would say that there isn't currently a "best alternative" but rather there is a small group of alternatives that each seem to have "use cases" as it were (shocker, kind of how it used to be in the 90s/00s before Google dominance). But even from person to person, people disagree on what the best use case for each is.

There's some focused more on "privacy" like DuckDuckGo and searX.

I've heard Bing has pretty good results for anything AI related for all Microsoft's investment in OpenAI.

I've heard good things about Qwant for music searches.

Someone else here in this thread just brought up Mojeek, which is supposed to be also privacy focused but includes searching by "emotion."

Presearch is decentralized, but I haven't looked "under the hood" of how its decentralization works.

Startpage is Google search results but behind a proxy so Google isn't getting your info when you search.

I mean, it seems like there's a lot of decent alternatives. I wouldn't be surprised if what's left of the shell of Yahoo! started investing in trying to outperform Google at this point.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

you still go there out of habit

Speak for yourself

[–] bulwark@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Kagi.com is one of the best services I pay for. I know paying for Internet search seems outrageous because we've been accustom to our data being the payment, but I think it's worth it. The search feature and added stuff really make it very functional plus the no adds or SEO type sites is bonus.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 18 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Search engines funded by ads have this perverse incentive to not give you the best possible results (or at least stop trying so hard to improve their results) so you search more (and thus served more ads). This may not be true for the underdogs (because they're trying to gain marketshare) but seems to be especially true for Google.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Kagi has kicked ass for me. Its paid, but you get what you pay for.

The only sore spot is image search.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 16 points 10 months ago

I started self hosting a SearxNG instance. It's pretty cool, it combines several engines while not spying on you.

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Google's search engine has gotten lazy, with the first dozen or more hits being YouTube and Reddit results.

[–] Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 10 months ago (3 children)

What if these are primary places where user generated content lives now? Independent blogs are as good as dead, and social networks are walled gardens, sometimes populated by self regurgitating robots.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›