this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
15 points (100.0% liked)

196

16484 readers
1977 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And the app is literally just a browser that opens up the mobile site. Oh and it needs access to your contacts, messages, camera, microphone, pictures, files, and call logs!

[–] animelivesmatter@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

But you still have to download the app, because if you open the site in your actual browser it blocks you from going further if you try to click on any links

[–] animelivesmatter@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, other visions of Web 3.0 are essentially a larger scale version of what the Fediverse already does. I'm not that optimistic, sadly, since that kind of decentralization isn't particularly profitable.

[–] emstuff@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago

theoretical vision of web3 versus the actual manifestation built to serve capital 👍

[–] gravelsDrachma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

3.0's about blockchain; the problem you're describing is like, late-stage 2.0. not to defend the app fetish or advocate for 3.0 by any means, lord no

[–] fiasco@possumpat.io 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's even more perplexing than that... One version of Web 3.0 is the crypto fantasy of being nickel-and-dimed for every single little thing. There's another, older Web 3.0 concept proposed by Tim Berners-Lee called the semantic web.

[–] gravelsDrachma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

we should ban naming things

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

No more naming things, you were given fingers, use them to point at things.

[–] MaoWasRight@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago
*>the crypto fantasy of being nickel-and-dimed for every single little thing.
*

Ah, the libertarian's fantasy.

Reminds me of this funny short story on the new yorker:

https://www.newyorker.com/humor/daily-shouts/l-p-d-libertarian-police-department

[–] emstuff@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

ur so right; at the same time, locked-down, ad-ridden apps are a very low-effort way for lazy developers to cram as much perceived value into blockchain as possible without actually benefiting consumers

this meme addresses a symptom of web 3.0 rather than the root cause or definition

[–] Gormadt@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Honestly to me it seems like the harder these massive Web 2.0 corps push for Web3 and trashing their services for an ever increasing profit margin the more I think that a Web 3.0 won't be Blockchain, but I think it will be something decentralized.

The web is increasingly experienced exclusively through social media and with the building of more decentralized services (and the gaining traction) the more I think a decentralized social media future may be unfolding.

I'm for it, I support FOSS for sure.

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Preach!

Conversely, hard clients > web apps.