this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
15 points (100.0% liked)

196

16484 readers
2584 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gravelsDrachma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

3.0's about blockchain; the problem you're describing is like, late-stage 2.0. not to defend the app fetish or advocate for 3.0 by any means, lord no

[–] fiasco@possumpat.io 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's even more perplexing than that... One version of Web 3.0 is the crypto fantasy of being nickel-and-dimed for every single little thing. There's another, older Web 3.0 concept proposed by Tim Berners-Lee called the semantic web.

[–] gravelsDrachma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

No more naming things, you were given fingers, use them to point at things.

[–] MaoWasRight@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago
*>the crypto fantasy of being nickel-and-dimed for every single little thing.
*

Ah, the libertarian's fantasy.

Reminds me of this funny short story on the new yorker:

https://www.newyorker.com/humor/daily-shouts/l-p-d-libertarian-police-department

[–] emstuff@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

ur so right; at the same time, locked-down, ad-ridden apps are a very low-effort way for lazy developers to cram as much perceived value into blockchain as possible without actually benefiting consumers

this meme addresses a symptom of web 3.0 rather than the root cause or definition