this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2023
67 points (100.0% liked)

sh.itjust.works Main Community

7701 readers
1 users here now

Home of the sh.itjust.works instance.

Matrix

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

At what point do y'all decide not to comment on a thread? Is 1 week+ too ’old’?

top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SJ_Zero@lemmy.fbxl.net 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Screw it, I'll necrothread like a forummancer.

[–] ScrumblesPAbernathy@readit.buzz 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Hell yeah, cyber archeology. Coming into old comments threads like Lawrence Fishburne, "this place is a tomb."

[–] your@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] imaqtpie@readit.buzz 4 points 1 year ago

Good job team

[–] tektite 1 points 7 months ago

Hello from the future!

[–] Seraph089@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't even really think about it, I just comment if I have something to say. At worst, nobody reads it and I was shouting into the void for a minute.

But the Lemmy userbase isn't massive yet, so those week+ old posts still see more engagement than you'd think.

[–] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Even on reddit new comments were sometimes useful. If I had a problem with some software it was useful to see how others solved it as time progressed.

[–] FlowerTree@pawb.social 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Given how little activities there are on most lemmy posts, I usually comment everytime I find a post worth commenting.

I usually decide whether to comment or not based on comment count instead of time. I'll happily comment on weeks or months old post if it only had one or two comments, but skip over hours old post if it already has plenty of comments.

[–] mauve@lemmy.pro 2 points 1 year ago

I do this too. Especially weeks/months/years old post that ask IT-related question that I found in the first place from search engine because I was trying to find the answer. I feel the obligation to leave a reply after I found the solution.

[–] bad_alloc@feddit.de 13 points 1 year ago

Be the person who finally posts a solution to a seven year old program, which then helps out one person needing that solution next year!

[–] pacanukeha@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago

a relevant response is timeless

[–] jerrimu@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Never. If it’s not locked and I have something to say imma say it.

[–] Granite@forum.fail 6 points 1 year ago

I posted on a two year old thread (not on the fediverse) this week. I found the thread by searching and I'm sure other people will too if they have the same problem. So why not?

[–] jeena@jemmy.jeena.net 10 points 1 year ago

I don't see a problem with posting to very old ones, even years old. There will always be someone after me who will approciate more context or information.

[–] hydrashok@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

I guess we'll see if I comment next week

[–] Gongin@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As a long time former lurker I'm trying to go based on active conversation, others saying what I had to say, and if it's something I'm interested in devoting time to. I'd say that is my criteria and not really how old the post is. The content.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I prefer old school forums with thread bumping, it saves a whole lot of repeats, it might not scale as well or work for everything, but where it works it's much better than the Reddit formula (which was also used on some forms of old school forums, I know).

[–] W_itjust_works@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You my first comment on tha interwebs, shout out

[–] imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

I like your username, very clever. Glad to have you here with us. I'd say just comment anywhere and everywhere, activity is the name of the game at this early stage

I'll necro a years-old thread without blinking. Never bothers me when somebody does it to a comment of mine, though I usually no longer have any idea what I was talking about.

[–] kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com 8 points 1 year ago

I think it really depends on the context of the post for me. For example, I wouldn’t bother to comment on a news article from 2 years ago, but a tech support request in a retro gaming forum might have some new relevant information

[–] Jessiebelle@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

I feel like this is something that arises organically in each community; on bigger r*ddit subs anything older than a few hours usually didn’t get read or responded to, but on Mastodon I’ve seen plenty of convos come back to life after weeks. If you have something meaningful to add, go for it. If nobody sees it, oh well

[–] Steve@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

If there aren’t many comments (and I have something useful for the OP) or if i have a question, then even a month is okay IMO.

But if it’s a post getting a ton of comments on a super popular sub or something that hit the front page or r/all… I give up even after 24 hours because my comment will never be seen.

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I do not impose artificial limits on myself.

[–] Gamers_Mate@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I would go with 6 months because after that it gets locked anyway. Well at least it did on Dig 5.0

[–] dominoko@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you have something to contribute, it is never too late. This isn't like forums where you "necro" a post.

[–] Entropywins@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Oh I'll find a way...

[–] Aninjanameddaryll@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago

Depends on the thread. Some things are going to be essentially useless the next day. Others might be in hours, or never reach EOL in terms of there being a point in commenting.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago
[–] Catpocalypse@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly I'm still trying to get over my lurker habits. They're very hard to break.

[–] finalbourbon@vlemmy.net 1 points 1 year ago

Same, lurking is all the dopamine hit of social media with none of the risk. eg. Can't correct my grammar and embarass me if I don't post.

[–] numbscroll@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

@W_itjust_works I really don’t pay attention tbh

For me it's generally a couple of days. Any longer and I feel I'm necro'ing the thread, though I have broken that guideline on occasion

[–] DiaryOfJayne@vlemmy.net 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Weirdest response I ever got was 2 years after I posted. Like, who are you talking to? I’m a completely different person now.

In smaller communities, a week or 2 isn’t so strange.

[–] Slimy_Hog@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I once posted that I wished I spent more time in a neighborhood in Chicago and 4 years later someone replied asking me for a realtor in that neighborhood. Though now that I think about it, that was probably just a bot.

[–] atypicaloddity@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Comment whenever you want, but based on Reddit I wouldn't expect a reply after a thread is more than ~2 days old. That may end up being different here.

[–] JadedIdealist@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

If its a serious question thread and I don't feel it has been answered well then I may comment even if it's weeks old.

[–] hrimfaxi_work@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago

I just set a calendar reminder to let you know in 7 years.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

There's no set time in terms of when I might comment: It would depend on the thread's context.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 year ago

I don't look at time. If I have something to comment then I do.

[–] ho0ch@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

I'm still reddit brained I would think anything after 24 hours is too long. but other people are right if you have something to say it's never too late lol

[–] CoderKat@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

For most threads, I won't comment on anything older than 2-3 days. In part because I comment largely with the hopes of discussion and it's unlikely I'll get replies in threads once they've fallen off of hot. But for stuff like a newly released movie discussion thread, I can go for several weeks after it was posted. There'll be more people watching the movie a few weeks in. Google was pretty good at finding the same thread when you googled "<movie> reddit". I sure hope the Fediverse gets similar soon.

[–] TheDeadGuy@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unless I'm helping someone, I try to refrain from posting on anything older than a day. I also don't try to add comments on everything I read cuz opinions are like assholes

[–] Entropywins@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

What everyone likes em?

I was vary much an "/all" super lurker, but as of recently we’ll see if an old dog learns new tricks.

[–] tinwhiskers@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

It depends on the nature of the material. If you wandered by, say a post about some AR glasses that you happened to own and could provide useful information, it'll still help people for years into the future. There really is no time limit to those. If it's just an opinion on some current event, or cool pic, then after a few days it probably has little to no value.

[–] lerba@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I think after a few days it's fair to expect nobody else but the author of the post and the commentators to see your reply. But if it's a niche thing it still might make sense to comment

[–] Ashtear@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Here, it just depends on what's on the front page. A week was too long for most anywhere on reddit, but here there are still some places where I think a week would be fine.