this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
117 points (100.0% liked)

Australian Politics

1271 readers
15 users here now

A place to discuss Australia Politics.

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Longmactoppedup@aussie.zone 30 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Typical of this Labor govt, this policy is about appearing to do something, than actually doing it effectively.

Why not have levies for all houses sitting vacant, not just foreign owned? Why not make annual fees higher and higher if you own more than say 3 properties? How about fees for land banking in cities ?

Also better make sure that a house used for air BNB 2 weeks a year doesn't count as being used.

[–] Excrubulent 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Well if they can appeal to people's xenophobia to deflect from the problems of landlords and capitalism in general then they'll do that. Gotta keep capitalism chugging along, even while they tut-tut about all the problems it's causing.

[–] Touching_Grass@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

r/Canada making more sense after reading this comment

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 21 points 10 months ago

GIVE. US. A. DOBBERS. LINE.

Just about everyone in the fucking street will know if a place is vacant

[–] No1@aussie.zone 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Why just foreign investors?

Because half the parliament & senate has investment properties and they don't want any responsibilities to actually rent them out to the plebs?

[–] melbaboutown@aussie.zone 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Imagine a temporary amnesty on squatting for all properties vacant for over a certain time limit. That would get them moving.

There is the risk of property damage and antisocial behaviour if people aren’t supported but it’s shameful that it’s got to this point.

[–] TinyBreak@aussie.zone 4 points 10 months ago

about F'n time!

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Foreign investors who leave property they own vacant will be slugged with charges of upwards of $169,000 under a federal government plan to free up more housing stock.

But Nationals leader David Littleproud said he didn't expect it to move the needle, because foreign investors were rich enough to afford the hiked fees.

Mr Littleproud said rules that require foreign buyers to hold at least temporary residency should be extended to either suspend foreign-owned purchases during the housing crisis, or ban them entirely.

Mr Chalmers said it was not clear how many were being left vacant, which was why the government would enhance compliance regimes within the tax office to ensure foreign investors were adhering to the rules.

"We are confident by increasing the fees in this way we will add to housing stock in this country, we'll put more properties on the rental market, and that means more opportunities for more Australians to find an affordable home."

Separately, as the treasurer prepares to release the mid-year budget update this week, Mr Chalmers has flagged gross debt has fallen in forecasts for the forward estimates.


The original article contains 509 words, the summary contains 185 words. Saved 64%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!