this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
16 points (76.7% liked)

Technology

58164 readers
3999 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I hope community will help in this situation! ;)

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tedvdb@feddit.nl 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't think removing protonmail is the correct solution.

This is a list of email providers that facilitate temporary email addresses. So adding outlook and Apple to that list makea more sense to me?

[–] privacyfighter@discuss.online 9 points 9 months ago (2 children)

But inclusion of Proton domains makes many Proton users to be unable to register on websites. It is only helping google to keep monopoly and it is simply privacy harming

[–] tedvdb@feddit.nl 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

How do you know this?

Besides that, this is just a list providing burner email addresses. Adding Outlook to this list makes sense. If sites are using this list as a blocklist that would cause issues, forcing them to not use this as blocklist anymore.

[–] InfiniWheel@lemmy.one 1 points 9 months ago

If I read correctly, in a PR someone makes an argument that Proton and Tuta are newer services that advertise privacy and anonymity as opposed to more well established services like Outlook or Apple mail that do end up linking mail to an identity.

[–] Spotlight7573@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

The list that the repo maintains is for services that can provide burner or anonymous emails.

You can sign up for Proton Mail anonymously, as demonstrated by a frequent contributor to that repo in issue #414.

Therefore, it seems appropriate for it to be on that list, as annoying as that is.

I'd hope that site providers wouldn't just summarily ban any domains on that list but I understand why they may take that shortcut to reduce spam/abuse if they don't have adequate resources to handle it other ways.

[–] Grangle1@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

I have a bad feeling that's what a lot of site providers will do, and you can almost guarantee the big tech data brokers will push them to do so, especially Google/Gmail. They will own our lives, by force if necessary.

[–] privacyfighter@discuss.online 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

You can sign up on Outlook anonymously too. Look video in this comment

[–] tedvdb@feddit.nl 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yes, that's why I proposed to add Outlook to the list too?

Mozilla provides a similar service I believe?

[–] privacyfighter@discuss.online 1 points 9 months ago

Yes. Aliases is not disposable mails. Moreover SimpleLogin (Proton aliasing service) forbids to use it as disposable in ToS

[–] Spotlight7573@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That video doesn't seem to have actually fully completed the registration process at Outlook though.

[–] privacyfighter@discuss.online 1 points 9 months ago

You can try by yourself (without “grey” ip)

[–] Teknikal@lemm.ee 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Leave Proton alone ffs, without them I would have my Internet seriously limited by default by UK isps and the moronic Government that just wants everything to be it's own propaganda.

[–] privacyfighter@discuss.online 5 points 9 months ago

That’s why I posted this. I hope we will find a way to unblock Proton

[–] Toes@ani.social 9 points 9 months ago

Blocking disposable emails is like fighting a hydra, they will always outplay a black list. This just hurts the legitimate users not on a popular provider.

[–] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't get the point of all these disposable email filters. It's not hard to buy a new domain and set up a wildcard email server.

[–] privacyfighter@discuss.online 4 points 9 months ago

Moreover you can use this website (it generates temporary working Gmail addresses) or this website where is new domain name every day

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If the repo owner declined the request, that's pretty much the end of it. They own it, they can do what they want.

[–] privacyfighter@discuss.online 6 points 9 months ago

He thinks that it is because of anonymous registration. But Outlook provides it too…

[–] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Why does anyone care? This library has no public dependants, and low double-digit weekly downloads. Nobody's using that crappy library in the first place because the idea as a whole is incredibly dumb and futile.

This is for 0.1x engineers that can't figure out a captcha on their side.

[–] privacyfighter@discuss.online 2 points 9 months ago

Unfortunately, I contacted support of some local websites, and they said that they wouldn’t white list any domains and I need to contact this list owner

[–] catastrophicblues@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago

This is the second time this month some overzealous moron decided to add these because they can be used for burner accounts, as if other services cannot. People like this are why we as a species haven’t advanced more.