this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
954 points (97.2% liked)

Political Memes

5613 readers
2222 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cerement 127 points 1 year ago (5 children)

when Tony’s Chocolonely started up based on slave free, the financial journals were doing headlines like “will they be able to survive this bold new direction?”

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They eventually found the cocoa market to be almost impossible to separate from slavery. They still do their best, which is a lot more than most, but they don't make any guarantees

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 year ago

They have some argument for doing business with one of the largest processors who’s not the worst but not provably ethical. Discouraging.

Found it:

At Tony’s, we exist so make all chocolate 100% slave-free, not just our own. That means climbing into the lion’s den and tackling change from within. It means getting to the root of the problem and paving the way for others by proving the scalability of our solutions.

Surprised that the processor, Barry Callebaut, is down for Tony to publish such blunt criticism of them. It’s like “don’t worry, Barry’s made a totally separate production line for us - only the Barry’s non-Tony production line contains the slave blood!”

[–] Resonanz 44 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Man, capitalism is just fucking wild, isn't it?

[–] cerement 52 points 1 year ago (2 children)

like Nestlé getting out of a child slavery lawsuit because none of the slavery happened in the US?

[–] positiveWHAT@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sometimes I wonder why mass shootings happen so often at universities and not at such HQs.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Lack of education

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Resonanz 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fuck it, from where I come from: people in agriculture get smacked just by existing or trying to build common cause with "let's end hunger in the world". I'm with you, salutations from America Latina ! And let's make those fuckers get what they deserve.

[–] cerement 19 points 1 year ago

Quando dou comida aos pobres, chamam-me de santo. Quando pergunto por que eles são pobres, chamam-me de comunista. (When I give food to the poor, they call me a saint. When I ask why the poor have no food, they call me a communist.)

—Dom Hélder Câmara, cited in Zildo Rocha, Helder, O Dom: uma vida que marcou os rumos da Igreja no Brasil (2000)

[–] M137@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Resonanz 3 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] metaStatic@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

The biggest problem with claiming to be slave free is that you need to own the farms to make sure, which means the locals don't get those profits either.

Whittaker's is slave free but they can't advertise it because they support the local economies ... which means they can't be reasonably sure slaves aren't used when they're not looking.

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have yet to see proof that Tony's is actually slavery free. And if it isn't (as in "we are doing oUr BeSt") then why the hell would I buy from them instead of... not buying chooclate?

[–] teegus@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because they pay a lot more to the producers.

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok so they pay more to the slave owners... how does that help the slaves?

[–] Altofaltception@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

They get whipped with gold plated chains instead of your low cost leather whips.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 55 points 1 year ago (5 children)
[–] troybot@midwest.social 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because slavery is so prevalent in cocoa farms that it's impossible to guarantee that no slave labor was used. Even if they make an effort use ethical sources they still can't make that guarantee.

[–] SirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Well, yeah, but also, if this is Nestlé, it's likely just too expensive to make sure.

Gotta have that unsustainable, permanent growth.

[–] squaresinger@feddit.de 13 points 1 year ago

We are (big air quotes) "slave free".

[–] cerement 12 points 1 year ago

ironically slave free …

[–] glibg10b@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

It's the cartoon style. Notice the curve after "WE'RE" and above the c in "chocolate"

[–] Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

If I see quotes like that on packaging, I treat it as a verifiable lie

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 52 points 1 year ago (3 children)

John Oliver covered this on Last Week Tonight. tl;dw Cocoa is almost exclusively grown in Ghana and Cote d'Ivoire, two West African countries. Most of these farms are family run and there are millions of them. All the Cocoa they produce is purchased by a few companies who dictate price. Because they buy at such a low price, the only way these farms make money is if they force children in their families to work the farm for no compensation. Ie. Child slavery.

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 20 points 1 year ago

The worst part is that the organizations that audit the farms in an effort to reduce slavery fail spectacularly. The Farms receive notice of the audit and what they hope not to find in advance, and then the audits only occur at most every 6 months but more likely every few years. A documentary team of students took a trip out to a few farms that receive these audits and found Child Slavery immediately.

[–] Filthmontane@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

After watching that episode I started going out and buying, Tony Chocolonely. Gotta support good businesses.

[–] WeeScottishMan@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Sadly I don't know how slave free Tony Chocolonely is, I was reading up about this the other day and they have been removed from the slave free chocolate list due to ties with big coco.

Article talking about it's removal - https://www.foodnavigator.com/Article/2021/02/16/Tony-s-Chocolonely-axed-from-Slave-Free-Chocolate-list-defends-ties-with-Barry-Callebaut

Slave free chocolate list - https://www.slavefreechocolate.org/ethical-chocolate-companies/

Hope this is helpful :)

[–] Filthmontane@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I highly doubt that nestle isn't using slave labor

[–] Buck@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Not just children in their family, even children from other regions are kidnapped and forced to work on the farms. It's genuine, old fashioned, slavery.

[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

Y'all need to read about the chocolate wars and the trade of it if you're surprised about this. Now is also the one time in history where chocolate has been it's most ethical and least slavery driven. Chocolate has never been 100% ethical

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I like how they tried to incorporate the quotation marks as some sort of quirky font by adding it above chocolate as well, yet it is still obvious.

[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Baizey@feddit.dk 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They just work for free because of the "implications"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Now with 40% less slavery!

[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

* Only applies to packaging.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

*made by sustainable inmates

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is that like gluten free? How many slaves are ground into a regular bar of chocolate?

[–] oce@jlai.lu 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It depends on how dark it is.

[–] Evil_incarnate@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

I like my chocolate like I like this joke. Dark.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Shanedino@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Wonder if it's like cagefree or free range chicken where the label is actually meaningless and could be actively misleading and still legal.

[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yeah probably when they say "slave free," they mean

our slaves are free because we don't have to pay for them 💡 😁

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They call them serfs now. Feudalism is back baby.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fosforus@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And Nestle is not even close to the worst chocolate maker: https://www.uow.edu.au/media/2023/at-chocolate-time-weve-discovered-what-the-brands-that-score-best-on-child-labour-and-the-environment-have-incommon.php

In the really shitty end of things are Mondelez and Unilever.

[–] Tier1BuildABear@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

And Mars, and Hershey

[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wait til you learn where much of organic bat guano fertilizer is sourced.

load more comments
view more: next ›