this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
43 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43939 readers
474 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Personally, I want nothing to do with them and I'm not willing to give them the benefit of the doubt. I moved to the Fediverse to get away from all these corpos.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WolfhoundRO@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

They're trojan horse. We can't stop them from creating their own servers, but we can choose to defederate them. Up with the Anti-Meta Defederation Pact

[–] pieceofcrazy@feddit.it 1 points 1 year ago

I don't know anything about it except for what you said, but yeah fuck them. I'd much rather donate my money (well, once I get a job that is) to a bunch of people to maintain a server and simply jump on another instance if anything weird happens than use another Meta's (or any other shitty corpo's) products

[–] Meepster@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Nope. Just nope. It'll be the death of the Fediverse.

[–] TIB3R@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

All instances should defederated with corporation instances ASAP

[–] Lor@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I'd reaaally rather not have that happen.

[–] Julian_1_2_3_4_5@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I have to say, i don't like it, i mean i got here, because i didn't want to have anything to do anymore with them, but i guess if we are careful enough, they probably can't do to much to destroy our current fediverse.

[–] fruitywelsh@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I'm excited to get some of my Facebook groups onto the fediverse,buyt still a wait and see approach makes the most sense before wholly endorsing this. Corps have a habit of "worst of all worlds" decisions tbh.

Stay the fuck away

[–] Grant@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I did my senior college paper on the fuckery that Facebook and Meta has caused and how harmful their data collection has been to American society. I will stop using any services that are bought up by Fuckerberg.

I do not want them in the fediverse and will not tolerate them for a second. The moment they form an instance is the moment I block their instance.

Fuck. Meta.

[–] alehc@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Mind sharing the TL;DR about your paper?

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Embrace, extend, extinguish

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ren@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Facebook et al has had a horrible track record of creating a new app/service and getting people on board. Their 3 successes are Facebook, Whatsapp (bought), and IG (bought). Every time they've launched an app outside of these, they failed (IGTV anyone?).

The Fediverse is open.

They can create Threads on activity pub and hope that they can create a server that competes with Twitter. Go for it, who cares. You can choose to follow people there or not, or join or not, or be on a server that defederates from it or not.

That's the beauty of it.

Meta's userbase is diverse. It has good and bad players. No need to broadstrokes it. If people join the Fediverse via Threads, many will discover Mastodon, Lemmy, Kbin, Calckey etc over time. Discovery & community!

So, like... in conclusion or whatever... everyone needs to chill. IMO.

[–] Crabhands@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Pros:

  • my friends join
  • larger community = more content
  • meta funding would likely contribute to fediverse growth and improvements
  • any instance can defederate them from said instance, which would mitigate almost every con

Cons:

  • Meta is evil and wants all your information to profile you and sell to other companies for profit
[–] Ministar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People are being really hypocritical.

You want a free open source social network. But when people you dont like join it, you hate it. That is not how it works, its not how FREE in FOSS works.

Meta can join, they can do whatever they want. It literally the point of this social network. If you dont like it, then go to a social network that is not FOSS, but is heavily moderated, because that is what most of you really want.

[–] HandOfDoom@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

"Freedom" can be used to justify lots of really bad stuff. Meta has too much money to be trusted, they WILL fuck the Fediverse up eventually for more profit on the first chance they get (and people with lots of money always get those chances).

And it's not just about morality and the fucked up stuff that's happened on Meta, Iike the Cambridge Analytica scandal. I stopped using Facebook years ago because of the low quality of the content being posted there. And last week I logged back in to sell some stuff and oh boy, the content managed to get even worse.

I don't want growth just for the sake of growth. We don't need big corporations getting involved.

[–] BabaDuda@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] briongloid@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Meta is developing a twitter like app called Threads which will implement ActivityPub.

[–] demvoter@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

To paraphrase from a bank robber - Meta is where the users are. If we want open source technology to grow, we need to have users. If you block Meta out of the gate, how do you get their users to transition? IMO, energy should be spent on strategizing how to get the users to transition to open source instances, not getting people riled up to block them immediately.

[–] SilentStorms@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I agree, so many people here quick to shut down a massive potential source of new users. Meta can 'enshittify' their own instance, but ActivityPub as a whole was designed so that no one entity can control the service.

[–] JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They will datamine any instance that federates with them. They have had so many privacy issues it would be insane to give them the benefit of the doubt again. A leopard can't change its spots.. Not to mention the NSA docs & Cambridge Analytica.

They have proven themselves to be a hostile actor on the Internet.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

For myself, I'm not a fan either. But I think it could be a very good thing for the fediverse (still not a fan of that word)


which, as I understand it, is all about choice: the ability to easily access content across the fediverse, with the ability to ignore it just as easily.

If it ends up breeding toxicity, then I'll block any subs, and possibly the whole instance†. And if it gets really bad, I'll just find a lemmy/mastodon/whatever instance that has defederated from them.

† Sounds like this maybe isn't possible yet, but is being looked at https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/2397

[–] IntlLawGnome@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think @tchambers put it well on his Mastodon post: no need to preemptively block, but "stay vigilant with eyes wide open and a finger on the block button."

[–] kool_newt@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

no need to preemptively block

I think this is like a Lucy and Charlie Brown trying to kick the football situation. How many times are we going to give capitalists who have shown their true colors over and over the benefit of the doubt and be shocked when they proceed to embrace, extend, and destroy?

It's not a preemptive block, it's a block based on a history of problematic actions.

Edit: Though idk if "blocking" them from making an instance is even an option. I expect a separate island of instances not federating with for-profit instances.

[–] Singletona@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I view them embracing federation as a good thing.

I also view it as important for the instances I wish to follow to never federate with them.

[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Just block them from federating and move on.

[–] ItsYourBoyHalo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If they join the Fediverse I am leaving. We have made the Fediverse to get away from coorporations like them, letting them join us will defeat the whole point of what we have.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] earthling@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Makes no difference to me. Those who believe they have privacy just because Meta and others don't yet have their own instance are mistaken.

[–] lamentforicarus@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't believe at all that I have any privacy on the internet. As someone in the US, I pretty much assumed I lost that when Bush signed the Patriot Act. My dislike of Meta joining has nothing to do with privacy and everything to do with their love of destroying good things for the sake of profit. I have no desire for yet another thing to become a corporate bullshit farm. This is honestly my last resort. If the fediverse is dismantled for profit, I'll just stop any type of social media whatsoever. It's not worth it to me.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί