this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2023
14 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45689 readers
1819 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jerrimu@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

because their lobbys pay lawmakers more!

In capitalism, the people with money make or influence the laws.

[–] nooneescapesthelaw@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Because people view their products as necessities to everyday life. People want to eat meat and and (real) cheese no matter what.

If without subsidies it becomes cheaper to import these types of foods, it becomes a national security issue.

Plus without subsidies this stuff gets more expensive, so people will start complaining

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

TIL people also eat (real) fossil fuels

[–] WheeGeetheCat@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Ah tradition, the argument that has definitely not been used to justify all kinds of problematic and horrific thing

[–] Ni@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are often talks of carbon taxing, but removing subsidies would seen to be the obvious first step. Subdiside greener options instead.

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Removing and reducing subsidies also generally has better polling as well from what I've seen

[–] Ni@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Do you think so? From the people I know I think cutting meat and fossil fuel subsidises would be very unpopular. We have climbing food prices so if meat became more expensive I think there might be uproar - it's needed though!

load more comments
view more: next ›