this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
162 points (97.6% liked)

World News

38948 readers
1937 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 63 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Russia is depleting their Soviet inheritance rapidly in Ukraine. There is visual confirmation of over 13,000 Russian vehicles lost in Ukraine, including over 2,500 Russian tanks lost. They are unable able to replace this level of loss.

[–] xkforce@lemmy.world 37 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Unfortunately Russia has a long history of throwing bodies at a problem until it is solved. They lost almost 30 million people in WWII and I have no doubt Putin would throw as many as he could get away with at Ukraine as was needed.

[–] Darukhnarn@feddit.de 38 points 11 months ago (1 children)

A lot of these bodies were Ukrainian back then.

[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 23 points 11 months ago (2 children)

He can solve it by withdrawing his forces.

[–] Slotos@feddit.nl 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

He’s achieving two of his goals: genocide of Ukrainians and genocide of minorities of Russian federation.

Why would he withdraw?

[–] ricdeh@lemmy.world -3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Genocide has no meaning anymore. The war between Ukraine and Russia is pretty much as conventional as it can get, stop using the term genocide inflationary

[–] Slotos@feddit.nl 4 points 11 months ago

Genocide has five very precise definitions that have no connection to the type of war being waged.

[–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

shhh common sense is too advanced for them

[–] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Comrade, allow me to show you beautiful view from 16th floor balcony. Very beautiful, is to die for.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

But first, a cup of tea. Be sure to drink all of it!

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

I don't think he could do 30 mil. His army is only about 3 million personnel including reservists per wikipedia, and AFU is claiming to have liquidated nearly 10% that many. Military theory is that an army loses all combat efficacy at around 30-40% casualties, and the rate of Russian casualties per day has gone up very significantly. After Russia spent all those lives in WWII, their demographics are still not what they used to be.

Despite the fact that they're paying troops so much to fight, it's not clear to me that they can sustain these losses indefinitely. What we're really seeing here is whether Putin's "military Keynesianism" can overcome Russia's demographic collapse. Experts are already saying Russia could not mount an invasion of this scale again for the foreseeable future.

I think they're going to end up as a failed state in the long run whether or not they succeed in Ukraine. The resistance would metastasize into an insurgency.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

They had more soldiers than guns.

Folks went into the front lines knowing the plan was to pick up guns from their dead commrades.

[–] giantofthenorth@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think it's important enough to note, there's no evidence showing this was the plan in any Soviet campaign in WW2. (But this is based off memory so there could be a single digit number of times)

In WW1? That would be accurate. Say what you will about Soviets but weapons were something they could produce and properly supply unlike the tsar.

In the Ukraine war though you are probably correct.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I'll admit my sources are unverifiable, while strong.

Stories from college professors. Guy was not a biased man, and was probably a fuggin mod on /r/askhistory; that type. 🤷‍♂️ Strong to me. No one listen to me. I'm drunk.

Edit: and my general history is not iron clad; could been WWI, but it seems a prevalent story beyond my eccentric old professor.

[–] andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun 6 points 11 months ago

I loved that you got two conscripts out of your barracks instead of one when playing as Russia in Command and Conquer.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 32 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Since the ruble was collapsed in value, are we sure this isn't inflation of existing current expenditures?

[–] TheBronko@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Their biggest problem is not the money but the people that have to build the tanks, if you kill many men in a war you will have less people that can produce goods especially in the steel industy where most of the people working there will be men that build the tanks for your war.

[–] tty5@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Emigration due to the war is about 10x of the Russian losses as reported by Ukraine

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Where does he get the money for that raise? It's not exactly raining money in Russia.

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Russia is burning their war chest rapidly right now to feed the war machine.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So how big is that war chest?

[–] Droechai@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

Imagine Gwynevere from Dark Souls... Now imagine that it's all inflated by "voluntary" "loans" from oligarchs

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The Russian President has approved a record budget increase of around 30% for military spending in 2024, reaching 36.6 trillion rubles (€376.7 billion).

Vladimir Putin has officially endorsed a substantial increase in military spending, approving draft budget plans that allocate approximately 30% of fiscal expenditure to the armed forces in 2024.

This surge amounts to an almost 70% increase in defence spending compared to 2023, reflecting Russia's unwavering commitment to its war in Ukraine.

Independent journalists Farida Rustamova and Maksim Tovkaylo estimate that approximately 39% of all federal spending in 2024 will be directed towards defence and law enforcement.

The budget's passage comes against the backdrop of Russia's prolonged military operation in Ukraine, prompting Vyacheslav Volodin, chairman of the State Duma of the Russian Federation, to assert that the budget was specifically crafted to fund the military and counter the repercussions of international sanctions imposed since Russia's deployment of troops into Ukraine in February 2022.

This budget approval underscores Russia's steadfast commitment to its military pursuits, even as the international community closely monitors the developments in the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.


The original article contains 358 words, the summary contains 180 words. Saved 50%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] mea_rah@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Independent journalists Farida Rustamova and Maksim Tovkaylo estimate that approximately 39% of all federal spending in 2024 will be directed towards defence and law enforcement.

39% might be even higher percentage than Ukraine. Not sure if there's any other country that would spend larger portion of their budget on military.

Absolutely crazy to spend that on offensive war.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

It is an offensive war, but a defensive decision.

If the house of cards collapses, all of these people are in deep shit.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

record spend

Record spendING, you halfwits.

[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Spend is a countable noun, valid in many parts of the world and used by a swathe of financial institutions